SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 29 May 2008
Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 72:908-916 (2008)
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2007.0353
© 2008 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wagner-Riddle, C.
Right arrow Articles by Jayasundara, S.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wagner-Riddle, C.
Right arrow Articles by Jayasundara, S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Wagner-Riddle, C.
Right arrow Articles by Jayasundara, S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Biogeochemical Processes
Right arrow Frozen Soils
Right arrow Field evaluation techniques
Right arrow Isotopes
Right arrow Nitrogen

SOIL PHYSICS

Linking Nitrous Oxide Flux During Spring Thaw to Nitrate Denitrification in the Soil Profile

C. Wagner-Riddlea,*, Q. C. Hub, E. van Bochovec and S. Jayasundaraa

a Dep. of Land Resource Science Univ. of Guelph Guelph, ON Canada N1G 2W1
b Institute of Soil Science and Fertilizer Shanxi Academy of Agricultural Science Taiyuan, Shanxi P.R. China
c Soils and Crops Research and Development Center Agriculture and Agri-food Canada, 2560 Hochelaga Blvd., Sainte-Foy, QC, Canada, G1V 2J3

* Corresponding author (cwagnerr{at}uoguelph.ca).

The importance of spring thaw nitrous oxide (N2O) fluxes to the total N2O emission budget in cold climates has been recognized recently. Two mechanisms have been proposed to explain the burst in N2O fluxes due to soil freezing and thawing: enhanced microbial activity due to increased nutrient availability at spring thaw, and release of N2O trapped at depth during winter. The objective of this study was to determine whether increased surface N2O fluxes were due to physical release at spring thaw of N2O accumulated all winter at depth in the soil profile, or whether fluxes were due to rapid N2O production in the surface layer during the thaw process. Micrometeorological flux measurements and a chamber method applied to in situ soil columns receiving 15N tracer were used in Ontario, Canada during winters of 2003 and 2004. Labeled K15NO3 fertilizer (60% excess 15N) at the rate of 100 kg N ha–1 was applied to two layers, that is, surface layer 0 to 5 cm (SL) and deep layer 12 to 17 cm (DL) in nondisturbed soil columns placed in the field during the winter. The burst in N2O fluxes from the soil surface measured by both methods occurred within the same period of soil thawing. Denitrification was the main mechanism responsible for N2O production, and conditions conducive to N2O and N2 production occurred both in the SL and DL during thawing. Despite high 15N2O concentrations at depth, the burst in N2O fluxes from DL soil columns were 1.5 to 5 times lower than that from SL soil columns as more N2O from DL was converted to N2 before diffusing out of the soil profile. Comparison of N2O fluxes originating from SL and DL soil columns indicates that the source of N2O burst at spring thaw is mostly ‘newly’ produced N2O in the surface layer, and not the release of N2O trapped in the unfrozen soil beneath the frozen layers.

Abbreviations: DL, deep layer 12 to 17 cm • SL, surface layer 0 to 5 cm







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2008 by the Soil Science Society of America.