SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 May 2008
Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 72:758-766 (2008)
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2007.0170
© 2008 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kallestad, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Mexal, J. G.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kallestad, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Mexal, J. G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Kallestad, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Mexal, J. G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Irrigation
Right arrow Plant and Soil Interactions
Right arrow Soil Methods/Instrumentation

SOIL PHYSICS

Comparison of Galvanic and Chemi-Luminescent Sensors for Detecting Soil Air Oxygen in Flood-Irrigated Pecans

J. C. Kallestad, T. W. Sammis* and J. G. Mexal

Department of Plant and Environ. Sci., MSC-3Q, New Mexico State Univ., Las Cruces, NM 88003

* Corresponding author (tsammis{at}nmsu.edu).

Low soil O2 levels have been shown to limit growth in pecan [Carya illinoinensis (Wangenh.) K. Koch] seedlings and may limit yield in mature trees. To assess changes in the gas-phase O2 concentration in a pecan orchard soil in response to flood irrigations throughout a growing season, two types of O2 sensor were field tested: a galvanic O2 sensor and a spectrometer-coupled chemical sensor (FOXY sensor). Galvanic sensors, housed in diffusion chambers, were buried at four depths and a datalogger recorded continuous voltage output. The FOXY O2 sensor was utilized as part of a mobile O2 detection system to field analyze gas samples withdrawn periodically from buried diffusion chambers. The FOXY sensor was found to be unstable, however, and difficult to calibrate under conditions of changing temperature and humidity. Laboratory experiments simulating submersion of the galvanic sensor indicated that voltage outputs were comparable to the range observed in the field, but the absence of diurnal concentration fluctuations, typically found in soil measurements, provided a way to discriminate between normal and aberrant output. The responsiveness of the galvanic sensor and its capability to continuously gather hourly data makes it superior to methods dependent on manual sample collection. Galvanic sensors were adequately suited for long-term in situ use in agricultural soil when housed in appropriate diffusion chambers. Higher costs, limited access to diffusion chambers during flood periods, and high variability associated with manually collected data make the FOXY mobile O2 detection system comparatively less optimal for use in agricultural settings.

Abbreviations: FEP, fluorinated ethylene–propylene • FOXY, fiber optic oxygen sensor system • LPSRC, Leyendecker Plant Science Research Center • PVC, polyvinyl chloride







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 2008 by the Soil Science Society of America.