SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 May 2008
Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 72:702-710 (2008)
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2007.0212
© 2008 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maeda, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ota, T.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Maeda, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ota, T.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Maeda, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ota, T.
Related Collections
Right arrow Nutrients
Right arrow Sorption/Exchange
Right arrow Nitrogen

SOIL & WATER MANAGEMENT & CONSERVATION

Deep-Soil Adsorption of Nitrate in a Japanese Andisol in Response to Different Nitrogen Sources

Morihiro Maeda*, Hirotaka Ihara and Takeshi Ota

Integrated Soil Fertility Management Res. Team, National Agricultural Research Center, 3-1-1 Kannondai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8666, Japan

* Corresponding author (mun{at}affrc.go.jp).

Nitrate adsorption in a deep Andisol with a high anion exchange capacity (AEC) needs to be studied for groundwater management. We evaluated N balances and NO3 content profiles under cropping in Andisol fields after 10 yr of repeated N additions of different N sources—swine compost (SC, N application rate of 800 kg ha–1 yr–1), coated urea (CU, 400 kg ha–1 yr–1), or NH4–N (AN, 400 kg ha–1 yr–1)—and an unfertilized control (NF). The N losses from the 0- to 20-cm layer of three N-treated soils during the experiment were 2300 to 2700 kg N ha–1, which were not significantly different (P > 0.05). Nitrate-N retention in deep-soil profiles up to 450 cm was 1800 to 2300 kg N ha–1 irrespective of N source (P > 0.05), and was 788 kg ha–1 in the NF treatment. On the other hand, the type of N source affected soil NO3 content profiles: NO3 from the two types of slow-release N additions (SC and CU) remained within a depth of 60 cm, whereas NO3 in the 180- to 280-cm layer was significantly higher in the AN treatment (P < 0.05). Stepwise multiple regression analysis showed that the primary contributor to soil NO3 content was Al content derived from allophane and imogolite, followed by soil pH and SO42– with negative impacts. In Andisols of Ibaraki, Japan, NO3 leached from the root zones is retained by adsorption in deep layers, which may reduce the risk of groundwater contamination at least for 10 yr.

Abbreviations: AEC, anion exchange capacity • AN, ammonium-nitrogen • CEC, cation exchange capacity • CU, coated urea • NF, no fertilizer • SC, swine compost







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 2008 by the Soil Science Society of America.