HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Jiménez Esquilín, A. E. Articles by Shepperd, W. D. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Jiménez Esquilín, A. E. Articles by Shepperd, W. D. Agricola Articles by Jiménez Esquilín, A. E. Articles by Shepperd, W. D. Related Collections Fire Soil Microbiology Forest Soils

SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY

Soil Scarification and Wildfire Interactions and Effects on Microbial Communities and Carbon

^a Dep. of Soil and Crop Sciences, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO 80523-1170
^b USDA-ARS Appalachian Farming Systems Research Center, 1224 Airport Rd., Beaver, WV 25813
^c USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, 240 West Prospect St., Fort Collins, CO 80526-2098

^* Corresponding author (mary.stromberger{at}colostate.edu).

Nutrient availability is an important constraint on sustainable forest productivity, and it is crucial to understand the long-term effects of management practices, including soil scarification, on soil microbial communities because they store and cycle nutrients. In addition, because forests are subject to wildfires, it would be useful to understand potential interactive effects of wildfire and management practice on forest soil ecosystems. We studied the individual and combined effects of soil scarification and a subsequent wildfire on microbial community structure of a ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa C. Lawson) forest soil in the central Rocky Mountains. Experimental plots were scarified by rototilling in 1981, and in 2002, some of the plots were burned during a mixed-severity wildfire. In 2005, mineral soil samples (0–10-cm depth) were collected and assayed for soil chemical properties, fungal and bacterial biomass, C mineralization potential, and microbial community fatty acid composition. Compared with undisturbed soil, soil from scarified-only plots was relatively high in pH, low in total C and organic matter (OM) concentrations, low in fungal and bacterial biomass, and enriched with Gram-positive biomarkers. Regardless of scarification treatment, soil from burned plots was relatively high in pH and extractable P, low in fungal but not bacterial biomass, and enriched with Gram-negative bacterial biomarkers. Compared with scarified-only plots, scarified-plus-burned plots had greater soil C and OM concentrations. Carbon mineralization rates were not different among the plot soils. While scarification is a positive practice for aiding seedling establishment, we found long-term effects on soil C reserves and microbial communities.

Abbreviations: EL-FAME, ester-linked fatty acid methyl ester • OM, organic matter • SIR, substrate induced respiration

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. A. Ippolito, K. A. Barbarick, M. E. Stromberger, M. W. Paschke, and R. B. Brobst Water Treatment Residuals and Biosolids Long-Term Co-Applications Effects to Semi-Arid Grassland Soils and Vegetation Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., September 11, 2009; 73(6): 1880 - 1889. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]