SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 29 October 2007
Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 71:1867-1877 (2007)
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2007.0002
© 2007 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, H.-J.
Right arrow Articles by Motavalli, P. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kim, H.-J.
Right arrow Articles by Motavalli, P. P.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Kim, H.-J.
Right arrow Articles by Motavalli, P. P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Soil Fertility and Productivity
Right arrow Spatial Variability
Right arrow Nutrient Management

SOIL FERTILITY & PLANT NUTRITION

Simultaneous Analysis of Soil Macronutrients Using Ion-Selective Electrodes

Hak-Jin Kima,*, John W. Hummelb, Kenneth A. Sudduthb and Peter P. Motavallic

a National Institute of Agricultural Engineering (NIAE), Suwon, South Korea 441-100
b USDA-ARS Cropping Systems and Water Quality Research Unit, Columbia, MO 65211
c Dep. of Soil Environmental and Atmospheric Sciences, Univ. of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211

* Corresponding author (kimhj69{at}rda.go.kr).

Automated sensing of soil macronutrients would be useful in mapping soil nutrient variability for variable-rate nutrient management. Ion-selective electrodes (ISEs) are a promising approach because of their small size, rapid response, and ability to directly measure the analyte. This study reports on the laboratory evaluation of a sensor array including three different ISEs, based on TDDA–NPOE and valinomycin–DOS membranes, and Co rod, for the simultaneous determination of NO3–N, available K, and available P in soil extracts. Thirty-seven Illinois and Missouri soils were extracted using the Kelowna soil extractant (0.25 mol L–1 CH3COOH + 0.015 mol L–1 NH4F). The response of each electrode type in mixed solutions of NO3, K, and P ions was modeled based on the Nikolskii–Eisenman equation with all coefficients of determination (r2) ≥0.95 (P < 0.001). In soil extracts, the NO3 ISEs provided concentrations similar to those obtained with standard laboratory methods (r2 = 0.89, P < 0.001). Concentrations obtained with the K ISEs were about 50% lower than those obtained with standard methods due to lower K extraction by the Kelowna solution (r2 = 0.85, P < 0.001). The P ISEs provided concentrations about 64% lower than those obtained with standard methods due to a combination of decreased P estimates in soil extracts and lower P extraction by the Kelowna solution; however, there was a strong linear relationship (r2 = 0.81, P < 0.001). Although P and K concentrations were low in comparison to standard laboratory procedures, a calibration factor could address this issue. These results show that ISE technology can be implemented successfully for NO3–N, available K, and available P measurement with the Kelowna extractant.

Abbreviations: EMF, electromotive force • ICP, inductively coupled argon plasma • ISE, ion-selective electrode







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2007 by the Soil Science Society of America.