SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 28 September 2007
Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 71:1770-1778 (2007)
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2007.0048
© 2007 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Blanco-Canqui, H.
Right arrow Articles by Lal, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Blanco-Canqui, H.
Right arrow Articles by Lal, R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Blanco-Canqui, H.
Right arrow Articles by Lal, R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Structure and Properties
Right arrow Tillage
Right arrow Soil Compaction

SOIL & WATER MANAGEMENT & CONSERVATION

Regional Assessment of Soil Compaction and Structural Properties under No-tillage Farming

Humberto Blanco-Canqui* and R. Lal

Carbon Management and Sequestration Center, FAES/OARDC School of Environment and Natural Resources, The Ohio State Univ., 412C Kottman Hall, 2021 Coffey Rd., Columbus, OH 43210-1085

* Corresponding author (blanco.16{at}osu.edu).

No-tillage (NT) farming is a proven technology for soil and water conservation, but its impacts on soil compaction and structure development are soil- and site-specific. We conducted a regional assessment of long-term (>5-yr) NT farming impacts on soil compaction, structure, and aggregate-associated soil organic carbon (SOC) concentration across 13 contrasting but representative soils in the eastern USA, each within a Major Land Resource Area (MLRA: 111C, 98, 114B, and 122 in Indiana; 111A, 111B, 111B2, 99, 111D, 124, and 126 in Ohio; and 147 and 127 in Pennsylvania). Each MLRA comprised NT, chisel plow (CP), and woodlot (WL) land uses. Impacts of NT management were moderate on soil compaction, small on soil structural properties, and nonsignificant on aggregate-associated SOC concentration. No-tillage soils had higher cone index (CI) and shear strength than CP in nine out of the 13 MLRAs, and they had the highest CI (~2 MPa) and shear strength (>180 kPa) within MLRAs 122 and 124. Bulk density ({rho}b) in NT was higher than in CP soils only in 111B (1.31 vs. 1.18 Mg m–3) and 127 (1.37 vs. 1.17 Mg m–3). No-tillage farming increased the mean weight diameter (MWD) of aggregates by a factor of 1.6 in MLRA 99, by 3.0 in 124, and by 5.3 in 111A, and reduced their tensile strength (TS) in 114B, 126, and 111B by a factor of ~2.5. Macroaggregates (>1 mm) contained 15 to 100% more SOC than microaggregates. Woodlot soils had the lowest {rho}b and TS and the highest MWD and aggregate-associated SOC concentration. The MWD increased with increasing SOC concentration. Overall, the impacts of no-tillage farming on soil compaction and structure were small compared with plow tillage.

Abbreviations: CI; cone index • CP, chisel plow • MLRA, Major Land Resource Area • MWD, mean weight diameter • NT, no-tillage • SOC, soil organic carbon • TS, tensile strength • WL, woodlot







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2007 by the Soil Science Society of America.