HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Douaik, A. Articles by Tóth, T. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Douaik, A. Articles by Tóth, T. GeoRef GeoRef Citation Agricola Articles by Douaik, A. Articles by Tóth, T. Related Collections Spatial Variability Soil Classification and Mapping Spatial Distribution

PEDOLOGY

Statistical Methods for Evaluating Soil Salinity Spatial and Temporal Variability

^a Research Unit on Environ. and Conserv. of Natural Resources, National Institute of Agric. Res. (INRA), Avenue Hassan II BP 415, 10000 Rabat, Morocco
^b Dep. of Soil Management and Soil Care, Ghent Univ., Coupure 653, 9000 Gent, Belgium
^c Research Institute for Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Herman Otto ùt 15, PO Box 35, 1525 II Budapest, Hungary

^* Corresponding author (ahmdk{at}hotmail.com).

Monitoring soil salinity requires knowledge of its magnitude and its spatial and temporal variability. To characterize the spatiotemporal variability of soil salinity in a native sodic grassland in the east of Hungary, we applied several statistical methods. Within a 25-ha study area, soil samples were taken repeatedly from 13 to 20 locations at 19 dates between November 1994 and June 2001 (with intervals between 2 and 9 mo). Electrical conductivity was measured both in the laboratory in a 1:2.5 soil/water suspension (EC_2.5) and in situ using a four-electrode probe (EC_a). These measurements were converted, via calibration regressions, into predicted EC_2.5*, which were compared with EC_2.5 in their ability to characterize the spatiotemporal variability of soil salinity. The temporal change in the mean soil salinity level between each subsequent two dates was evaluated using a paired t-test, a test of significance of the regression parameters based on the concept of temporal stability, and a temporal mean shift test. The static–dynamic (uniform–nonuniform) nature of the temporal change in the spatial pattern of soil salinity between two dates was evaluated using the same concept of temporal stability and a spatial shift test. For either type of temporal change (mean level or spatial pattern), the methods agreed for some pairs of dates and did not for others, but these differences were partly due to differences in data input. The method to use depends on the data availability and the aim of the study. The joint use of temporal stability and temporal mean shift and spatial shift tests could result in a drastically reduced sampling effort.

Abbreviations: EC_2.5, soil electrical conductivity determined from a 1:2.5 soil/water suspension • EC_2.5*, electrical conductivity in a 1:2.5 soil/water suspension predicted from apparent electrical conductivity using calibration regression equation • EC_a, apparent soil electrical conductivity • EC_e, electrical conductivity of a water-saturated soil paste • MD, mean difference