SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 29 June 2007
Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 71:1314-1322 (2007)
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2006.0323
© 2007 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cockx, L.
Right arrow Articles by De Vos, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Cockx, L.
Right arrow Articles by De Vos, B.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Cockx, L.
Right arrow Articles by De Vos, B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Forest Soils
Right arrow Electromagnetic Induction, EMI
Right arrow Spatial Variability

PEDOLOGY

Using the EM38DD Soil Sensor to Delineate Clay Lenses in a Sandy Forest Soil

L. Cockxa,*, M. Van Meirvennea and B. De Vosb

a Dep. of Soil Management and Soil Care, Ghent Univ., Coupure 653, 9000 Gent, Belgium
b Research Institute for Nature and Forest, Gaverstraat 4, 9500 Geraardsbergen, Belgium

* Corresponding author (liesbet.cockx{at}ugent.be).

The objective of this study was to locate clay lenses in a sandy forest soil. The study site was a Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) plantation in the Campine region of Belgium, which has been selected as a European Union-funded Level II Research Site for soil monitoring. Typically, the soils in the area have homogeneous sandy soil profiles, but clay lenses occur locally within a depth of 2 m of the soil surface. Locating these clay lenses is necessary because they can have a substantial impact on soil processes. Therefore, we used the EM38DD soil sensor to measure the soil apparent electrical conductivity (ECa) simultaneously in two orientations. Apparent electrical conductivity maps were generated and it was found that the variation in ECa was mainly driven by the spatial variability of soil texture across the study site. The ratio of the two orientations (profile ratio or PR) clearly revealed a circular pattern with decreased PR values (<1), which was identified as a clay lens. To delineate the extent of this lens, two numerical methods were used: (i) a fuzzy-k-means classification of the PR map focusing on the lowest centroid class, and (ii) a probability approach through indicator kriging. Using a validation image obtained from directed auguring, cell-by-cell comparisons were made for these two methods complemented with spatial accuracy measures. Although both methods tended to underestimate the spatial extent of the clay lens, the indicator kriging method was the most accurate, with an overall accuracy of 0.838, a proportion of error due to locational errors ({kappa}-loc) of 0.864, and an average similarity of 0.841.

Abbreviations: AUC, area under the curve • CEC, cation exchange capacity • ECa, apparent electrical conductivity • EC_h, electrical conductivity measurement in the horizontal orientation • EC_v, electrical conductivity measurement in the vertical orientation • EMI, electromagnetic induction • FPI, fuzziness performance index • GPR, ground penetrating radar • IK, indicator kriging • NCE, normalized classification entropy • OK, ordinary point kriging • PR, profile ratio • ROC, receiver operating characteristic • RNE, relative nugget effect







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 2007 by the Soil Science Society of America.