HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Moret, D. Articles by Arrúe, J. L. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Moret, D. Articles by Arrúe, J. L. Agricola Articles by Moret, D. Articles by Arrúe, J. L. Related Collections Hydraulic Conductivity Soil Methods/Instrumentation Structure and Properties

SOIL PHYSICS

Characterizing Soil Water-Conducting Macro and Mesoporosity as Influenced by Tillage Using Tension Infiltrometry

Departamento de Suelo y Agua, Estación Experimental de Aula Dei, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones, Científicas (CSIC), PO Box 202, 50080 Zaragoza, Spain

^* Corresponding author (david{at}eead.csic.es).

Knowledge of soil water conductive porosity is of paramount importance for understanding the water and solute movement in soil. The objective of this study was to describe and evaluate an alternative pore index, i.e., the representative mean pore radius for two consecutive soil water tensions (), for characterizing the water-transmitting macro- and mesoporosity of soil. The hydraulic conductivity (K) and related hydraulic parameters were measured using a tension disk infiltrometer at –14, –4, –1, and 0 cm water pressure heads at a soil depth of 2 cm on a long-term conservation tillage experiment (after 9 yr of trial) under conventional tillage (CT), reduced tillage (RT), and no-tillage (NT) treatments. The soil was loam (Xerollic Calciorthid). The measurements were performed within the first half of a 16- to 18-mo-long fallow period. Unlike the model based on the classical capillary rise theory, which assumes no differences between measurement sites (e.g., tillage treatments) for the corresponding equivalent pore radius (C₀) for macro- and mesopores, significant differences in values for macro- and mesopores were found between the three tillage systems tested. The number of water-transmitting macro- and mesopores per unit area estimated by means of the capillary rise approach was significantly greater than that calculated using the pore index. Although significantly higher values of for both macro- and mesopores were observed under NT, a significantly lower near-saturation K was found under NT than CT and RT treatments due to the lower density of water-transmitting macro- and mesopores.

Abbreviations: CT, Conventional tillage • NT, no-tillage • RT, reduced tillage