SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 12 March 2007
Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 71:430-441 (2007)
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2006.0074
© 2007 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kucharik, C. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kucharik, C. J.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Kucharik, C. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Ecosystem Restoration
Right arrow Carbon Sequestration
Right arrow Soil Conservation

SOIL & WATER MANAGEMENT & CONSERVATION

Impact of Prairie Age and Soil Order on Carbon and Nitrogen Sequestration

Christopher J. Kucharik*

Center for Sustainability and the Global Environment, The Nelson Inst. for Environmental Studies, Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53726

* Corresponding author (kucharik{at}wisc.edu).

Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) prairie restorations can sequester soil C and N, but the varied effects of soil order and ecosystem age are uncertain. Soil bulk density (Db) (0–20 cm) and soil organic C (SOC) and total N at 0 to 5, 5 to 10, and 10 to 25 cm were measured at 39 paired CRP–crop sites in Wisconsin to quantify SOC and N stock changes as a function of prairie age (4–16 yr) and soil order (Alfisols and Mollisols). Several important outcomes were found regarding land conversion to CRP: (i) soil Db decreased on Alfisols (–0.12 ± 0.11 g cm–3, P < 0.0001) but not Mollisols; (ii) SOC sequestration rates were not significantly different between Mollisols (49.7 ± 64 g C m–2 yr–1) and Alfisols (43.9 ± 86 g C m–2 yr–1), but were only detectable (P < 0.05) in the upper 5 cm; (iii) whole SOC and N to a depth of 25 cm did not change significantly; (iv) the annual average SOC sequestration rate declined (P < 0.05) as prairie age increased (from 72 ± 105 to 13 ± 25 g C m–2 yr–1 for youngest to oldest age groupings); and (v) short-term SOC and N increases could be lost with time. These data suggest that there may be a discontinuity between the intensity of continuing management that is needed for sustained, long-term SOC increases in planted prairies and the resources that the CRP has available to achieve this level of ecosystem functioning.

Abbreviations: Db, bulk density • CRP, conservation reserve program • GPS, global positioning system • SOC, soil organic carbon • TN, total soil nitrogen




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
R. H. Skinner
High Biomass Removal Limits Carbon Sequestration Potential of Mature Temperate Pastures
J. Environ. Qual., June 23, 2008; 37(4): 1319 - 1326.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2007 by the Soil Science Society of America.