SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 12 March 2007
Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 71:397-405 (2007)
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2006.0061
© 2007 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eshel, G.
Right arrow Articles by Singer, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Eshel, G.
Right arrow Articles by Singer, M. J.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Eshel, G.
Right arrow Articles by Singer, M. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Water Quality
Right arrow Dryland Soils
Right arrow Carbon Sequestration

SOIL & WATER MANAGEMENT & CONSERVATION

Total Soil Carbon and Water Quality: An Implication for Carbon Sequestration

Gil Eshela,*, Pinchas Finea and Michael J. Singerb

a Inst. of Soil, Water and Environ. Sciences ARO, The Volcani Center, Bet Dagan 50250, Israel
b Dep. of Land, Air and Water Resources, Univ. of California, Davis, CA 95616

* Corresponding author (geshel{at}volcani.agri.gov.il).

Carbon sequestration in soil has been suggested as a means of reducing the rate of increase of atmospheric CO2. Most soil science research has been on soil organic carbon (SOC) sequestration but in arid and semiarid climates, soil inorganic carbon (SIC) may offer another option for C sequestration. A field study was conducted in Bakersfield, CA, to determine if irrigation water quality (fresh water [FW] vs. treated effluent [TE]) affected the distribution and amount of SIC and SOC in the upper 4 m of soil and parent material compared to a nonirrigated (NI) field. Significant carbonate depletions were found in the upper 2 m in both irrigated fields compared with the NI. Differences in carbonate content between irrigated fields were also related to soil texture. Total carbonate and clay-size carbonate were more abundant at the sites irrigated with TE than at the sites irrigated with FW, indicating that the TE had inhibited carbonate dissolution. Based on stable isotope analyses (13C and 18O) and radiocarbon dating, we estimated that irrigation for >75 yr sequestered about 7.15 kg m–2 (4 m)–1 of SIC under FW and between 0.9 and 2.4 kg m–2 (4 m)–1 under TE, if carbonate dissolution is C sequestration. Adding C loss due to SOC decomposition to the SIC sequestration, the fields may be a source for 8.8 and 17.4 to 15.9 kg m–2 (4 m)–1 of C under FW and TE, respectively. This study provides some of the first evidence of how water quality affects the C budget in an arid region.

Abbreviations: FW, freshwater • NI, nonirrigated • PSD, particle size distribution • SIC, soil inorganic carbon • SOC, soil organic carbon • TE, treated effluent







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2007 by the Soil Science Society of America.