HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wills, S. A. Articles by Sandor, J. A. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Wills, S. A. Articles by Sandor, J. A. GeoRef GeoRef Citation Agricola Articles by Wills, S. A. Articles by Sandor, J. A. Related Collections Carbon Sequestration Soil Models Soil Analysis

PEDOLOGY

Prediction of Soil Organic Carbon Content Using Field and Laboratory Measurements of Soil Color

^a Dep. of Environ. Science and Technology Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742
^b Dep. of Agronomy, Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA 50011

^* Corresponding author (skye{at}umd.edu).

The understanding, prediction, and modeling efficacy of soil organic carbon (SOC) distribution across fields and larger regions requires a large number of samples that are costly to analyze. The objective of this study was to evaluate soil color measurements to predict SOC for agriculture and prairie land uses. Munsell soil color book (B) and chroma meter (C) color readings were taken at the midpoint depth of each horizon (HB and HC) and predetermined depth increments (IB and IC) on 125 cores. Horizon matrix (HD) colors were determined by standard description. A chroma meter was used to determine the color of prepared samples, ground to <2 mm. Both color data sets were used in a regression analysis to predict SOC content by weight and volume. The best predictors for each technique are the models that incorporate Munsell value and chroma along with the depth from which the measurement was taken. Separating samples by land use improved the prediction of SOC. Transforming SOC content by log₁₀ improved the coefficient of determination for nearly all models. The best predictors of SOC were HD for SOC by weight (agricultural field r² = 0.79, prairie r² = 0.53), HB for SOC by volume (agricultural field r² = 0.76, prairie r² = 0.57), and IC and IB for log-transformed SOC by weight and volume (agricultural field r² = 0.84, prairie r² = 0.62). This study indicates that while SOC content predictions can be made with field measurements, there are limitations to their predictive usefulness.

Abbreviations: HB, Munsell color book readings by horizon • HC, chroma meter readings by horizon • IB, Munsell color book readings by depth increment • IC, chroma meter readings by depth increment • SCd, chroma meter readings on dry samples • SCm, chroma meter readings on moist samples • SOC, soil organic carbon