HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Veenstra, J. J. Articles by Mitchell, J. P. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Veenstra, J. J. Articles by Mitchell, J. P. Agricola Articles by Veenstra, J. J. Articles by Mitchell, J. P. Related Collections Isotopes Carbon Sequestration Tillage

SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY

Tillage and Cover Cropping Effects on Aggregate-Protected Carbon in Cotton and Tomato

^a Dep. of Agronomy, 1025 Agronomy Hall, Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA 50011
^b Dep. of Land, Air and Water Resources, Univ. of California, Davis, CA 95616-8627
^c Dep. of Plant Sciences, Univ. of California, Davis, CA 95616

^* Corresponding author (veenstra{at}iastate.edu).

Conservation tillage (CT) and cover cropping (CC) are agricultural practices that may provide solutions to address water and air quality issues arising from intensive agricultural practices. This study investigated how CT and CC affect soil organic matter dynamics in a cotton(Gossypium hirsutum L.)–tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) rotation in California's San Joaquin Valley. There were four treatments: conservation tillage, no cover crop (CTNO); conservation tillage with cover crop (CTCC); standard tillage, no cover crop (STNO); and standard tillage with cover crop (STCC). After 5 yr, the top 30 cm of soil in CTCC had an increase of 4500 kg C ha^–1, compared with an increase of 3800 kg C ha^–1 in STCC from initial soil C content in 1999. To enhance our understanding of C dynamics in CT systems, we pulse-labeled cotton with ¹³CO₂ in the field and followed the decomposition of both the roots and the shoots through three physical fractions: light fraction (LF), which tends to turnover quickly, and two relatively stable C pools—intraaggregate LF (iLF) and mineral-associated carbon (mC). Soil under CT treatments retained more of the cotton-residue-derived C in LF and iLF than ST 3 mo after placement in the field. These differences disappeared after 1 yr, however, with no discernable differences between CT and ST regardless of CC. In California's Mediterranean climate, CT alone does not accumulate or stabilize more C than ST in tomato–cotton rotations, and the addition of cover crop biomass is more important than tillage reduction for total soil C accumulation.

Abbreviations: CT, conservation tillage • CTCC, conservation tillage with cover crop • CTNO, conservation tillage, no cover crop • iLF, intraaggregate light fraction • LF, light fraction; mC, mineral-associated carbon • SOM, soil organic matter • ST, standard tillage • STCC, standard tillage with cover crop • STNO, standard tillage, no cover crop