HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ilg, K. Articles by Siemens, J. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Ilg, K. Articles by Siemens, J. GeoRef GeoRef Citation Agricola Articles by Ilg, K. Articles by Siemens, J. Related Collections Laboratory Column Studies Colloids Soil Methods/Instrumentation

SOIL PHYSICS

Comparing Unsaturated Colloid Transport through Columns with Differing Sampling Systems

^a Dep. of Soil Science, Inst. of Ecology, Berlin Univ. of Technology, Salzufer 11-12, D-10587 Berlin, Germany
^b Dep. of Soil Protection, Inst. of Ecology, Berlin Univ. of Technology, Salzufer 11-12, D-10587 Berlin, Germany
^c Dep. of Geochemistry, Hydrogeology and Mineralogy, Freie Universität Berlin, Malteser Straße 74-100, D-12249 Berlin, Germany
^d Dep. of Soil Science, Inst. of Ecology, Berlin Univ. of Technology, Salzufer 11-12, D-10587 Berlin, Germany

^* Corresponding author (katrin.ilg{at}tu-berlin.de).

Methodological difficulties of colloid sampling in the vadose zone are limiting our knowledge regarding the relevance of colloid transport for groundwater contamination. We compared the colloid sampling efficiency of five different lysimeters in a column experiment (9 cm length, 8 cm diameter) using ⁵⁹Fe-labeled goethite: polyester membranes with a pore diameter of (i) 1.2 µm and (ii) 10 µm, (iii) porous glass plates with 16-µm pore diameter, (iv) wick samplers, and (v) zero-tension lysimeters. Four replications of each lysimeter type were tested with concentrations of 0.1 and 10 mg L^–1 goethite. The irrigation rate was 58 mm h^–1, which caused an average transport velocity of 240 mm h^–1. Compared with NO₃^–, a tendency of accelerated transport of goethite in the sand columns was observed. The mean recovery of ⁵⁹Fe for all lysimeters was 30.7 ± 6.7% for the small and 3.4 ± 3.5% for the large colloid input concentration. For the small goethite concentration, no differences between lysimeter systems were detected. In contrast, the lysimeters performed differently at large concentrations: zero-tension and 10-µm membrane lysimeters showed the largest (9.1 and 6.8%), wick lysimeters the smallest colloid recovery (0.7%), which was related to trapping of colloids in the wick. We conclude that membranes of 10-µm pore size and zero-tension lysimeters are superior for colloid sampling, but the results of the latter may be biased toward an overestimation of colloid transport because of water saturation at the lysimeter–soil interface.

Abbreviations: CDE, convection–dispersion equation.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. Weihermuller, J. Siemens, M. Deurer, S. Knoblauch, H. Rupp, A. Gottlein, and T. Putz In Situ Soil Water Extraction: A Review J. Environ. Qual., October 24, 2007; 36(6): 1735 - 1748. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]