HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Leij, F. J. Articles by Dane, J. H. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Leij, F. J. Articles by Dane, J. H. GeoRef GeoRef Citation Agricola Articles by Leij, F. J. Articles by Dane, J. H. Related Collections Analytical Solutions Water Flow Models Field evaluation techniques

SOIL PHYSICS

Analytical Solutions to Evaluate the Stream Tube Approach for Field-Scale Modeling of Evaporation

^a Dep. of Civil Engineering, California State Univ., Long Beach, CA 90840
^b Dep. of Agronomy & Soils, Auburn Univ., Auburn, AL 36849

^* Corresponding author (danejac{at}auburn.edu).

Quantifying upward flow across larger areas of the landscape is important for water resources management and research involving global exchange processes. The stream tube or parallel column model may be used for this purpose. Columns should be narrow enough to account for variability of local parameters and wide enough to minimize the effect of lateral flow. To provide guidance with the selection of minimum column width, an approximate analytical solution was obtained for steady flow in a medium composed of two vertical soil columns. The normalized matric flux potential, , was used as a dependent variable. The two-dimensional solution consisted of a one-dimensional term and a perturbation term to ensure continuity in water flux and soil pressure head, h. Comparison of two-dimensional and one-dimensional stream tube results showed little difference in h and , except near the interface. The greatest effect was found for finer textured soils. An analytical expression for the lateral flux was obtained from the solution for . For "wet" conditions involving a shallow water table and high surface water contents, the lateral flux was found to be no more than 5% of the evaporative flux. For "dry" conditions with miniscule fluxes, the evaporative and lateral fluxes may be of the same order of magnitude; application of the stream tube model could involve considerable error. The analytical solutions are convenient to evaluate the impact of stream tube width for different evaporation scenarios and also to verify more elaborate numerical schemes.