HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Zacharias, S. Articles by Wessolek, G. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Zacharias, S. Articles by Wessolek, G. GeoRef GeoRef Citation Agricola Articles by Zacharias, S. Articles by Wessolek, G. Related Collections Pedotransfer Functions Water Retention/Capillary Pressure Soil Organic Matter

SOIL PHYSICS

Excluding Organic Matter Content from Pedotransfer Predictors of Soil Water Retention

Faculty of Civil Eng. and Geodetic Sci., Inst. of Water Resources Management, Hydrology and Agric.Hydraulic Engineering, Univ. of Hannover, Appelstr. 9A, D-30167, Hannover, Germany

Gerd Wessolek

Dep. of Soil Science, Inst. of Ecology, Technical Univ. of Berlin, Salzufer 11-12, D- 10587, Berlin, Germany

^* Corresponding author (steffen.zacharias{at}googlemail.com).

The majority of pedotransfer functions (PTFs) published for estimating water retention characteristics (WRC) use data on soil texture, bulk density, and organic matter content (OM) as predictors. For soil hydrological modeling on a regional scale, in particular the derivation of appropriate values for a PTF parameterization can be difficult where organic C data are missing. Assuming the indirect interdependency between OM and bulk density, a new PTF has been developed that estimates the WRC using only soil texture and bulk density data. To achieve a regression-based reproduction of the correlations, a calibration was chosen that connects the parameters of the van Genuchten equation with the data on bulk density and soil texture, using linear and nonlinear relationships. More than 90% of the variability in measured soil water contents was explained by the new model. The validity of the PTF was tested with a data set of 147 measured WRCs (r² = 0.94). Compared with another frequently used PTF model, which uses the organic C content as an additional predictor, the new model provided comparable or slightly better predictions of the WRCs.