HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Scharf, P. C. Articles by Davis, J. G. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Scharf, P. C. Articles by Davis, J. G. Agricola Articles by Scharf, P. C. Articles by Davis, J. G. Related Collections Soil Fertility and Productivity Nutrient Management Production Agriculture Nitrogen Site-Specific Analysis

Nutrient Management & Soil & Plant Analysis

Spatially Variable Corn Yield is a Weak Predictor of Optimal Nitrogen Rate

^a Plant Sciences Division, Univ. of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211
^b USDA-ARS, Cropping Systems and Water Quality Research Unit, Columbia, MO 65211
^c USDA-NRCS, Columbia, MO 65203

^* Corresponding author (scharfp{at}missouri.edu)

Historically, a mass-balance approach (yield goal times a factor) has been the dominant method for making N fertilizer rate recommendations. Although several states have moved away from the mass-balance approach for N rate recommendations for corn (Zea mays L.), much of the effort that has gone into variable-rate N research has focused on combining spatial yield predictions with a mass-balance approach. Our objectives were to evaluate, at field scale, the relationship between spatially variable yield levels and economically optimal N fertilizer rates (EONR) and to evaluate the performance of yield-based N rate recommendations. Eight experiments were conducted in three major soil areas (Mississippi delta alluvial, deep loess, claypan) over 3 yr. Treatments were field-length strips of discrete N rates from 0 to 280 kg N ha^–1. Yield data were partitioned into 20-m increments and a quadratic-plateau function was used to describe yield response to N rate for each 20-m yield cell. The EONR varied much more widely than did plateau yield. Yield level explained on average only 15% of the variability in EONR. Averaged over the eight fields, variable application of mass-balance-based N rates based on actual yields would have increased yield by only 31 kg ha^–1, and profit by $2 ha^–1, relative to uniform mass-balance N rates based on field average yields. In comparison, variable-rate application of EONR would have increased profit by an average of $38 ha^–1. Of this, $14 ha^–1 could have been obtained by uniform application of the median optimal N rate for each field. We conclude that although we observed considerable spatial variability in optimal N rates, this was due mainly to variations in soil N supply and N uptake efficiency, rather than to variations in crop demand for N. Yield variability appears to be at best a small part of the information that must be used to make successful variable-rate N recommendations for corn.

Abbreviations: EONR, economically optimal N rate