SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 20 September 2006
Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 70:1932-1935 (2006)
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2006.0043N
© 2006 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Artieda, O.
Right arrow Articles by Drohan, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Artieda, O.
Right arrow Articles by Drohan, P. J.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Artieda, O.
Right arrow Articles by Drohan, P. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Soil Classification and Mapping
Right arrow Soil Analysis
Right arrow Soil Chemistry

Pedology Note

Refinement of the Differential Water Loss Method for Gypsum Determination in Soils

O. Artiedaa, J. Herrerob,* and P. J. Drohanc

a Univ. of Extremadura, 10600 Plasencia, Cáceres, Spain
b Soils and Irrigation Dep., Agri-Research Center of Aragon, P.O. Box 727, 50080 Zaragoza, Spain
c Pine Lake Institute for Environmental and Sustainability Studies, Hartwick College, Oneonta, NY 13820-4020

* Corresponding author (jhi{at}aragon.es)

Determining the gypsum content in soil is lengthy and cumbersome using methods based on SO4 determination. Moreover, as these methods do not strictly titrate gypsum, inaccuracies can be produced by the presence of sulfate minerals other than gypsum. The thermogravimetric properties of gypsum, however, allow determination of its content in a rapid and easy way sufficiently accurate for many pedologic purposes. Our objective was to expand the lower limit of gypsum detection to make the test useful for soil classification and management. We have refined the differential water loss method by estimating the gypsum percentage from the loss of water in the soil sample between 70 and 90°C. Our results, compared with gravimetric determinations of precipitated BaSO4, found coefficients of determination of 0.98 for gypsum contents ranging from 2 to 50%, and 0.99 for contents >50%. The method is valid for gypsum contents >2% and thus improves previous estimation procedures.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
J. Herrero, O. Artieda, and W.H. Hudnall
Gypsum, a Tricky Material
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., September 11, 2009; 73(6): 1757 - 1763.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
I. Lebron, J. Herrero, and D.A. Robinson
Determination of Gypsum Content in Dryland Soils Exploiting the Gypsum-Bassanite Phase Change
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., February 6, 2009; 73(2): 403 - 411.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2006 by the Soil Science Society of America.