HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Livingston, G. P. Articles by Spartalian, K. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Livingston, G. P. Articles by Spartalian, K. Agricola Articles by Livingston, G. P. Articles by Spartalian, K. Related Collections Biogeochemical Processes Landscape-Atmosphere Interactions Air Pollution

Soil Physics

Trace Gas Emission in Chambers

A Non-Steady-State Diffusion Model

^a Rubenstein School of the Environment and Natural Resources
^b Dep. of Physics, Univ. of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05602
^c USDA-ARS, Natural Resources Research Center, Fort Collins, CO
^d current address: Altos Imaging, Hinesburg, VT 05461

^* Corresponding author (glivings{at}madriver.com)

Non-steady-state (NSS) chambers are widely used to measure trace gas emissions from the Earth's surface to the atmosphere. Unfortunately, traditional interpretations of time-dependent chamber concentrations often systematically underestimate predeployment exchange rates because they do not accurately represent the fundamental physics of diffusive soil gas transport that follows chamber deployment. To address this issue, we formally derived a time-dependent diffusion model applicable to NSS chamber observations and evaluated its performance using simulated chamber headspace CO₂ concentration data generated by an independent, three-dimensional, numerical diffusion model. Using nonlinear regression to estimate the model parameters, we compared the performance of the non-steady-state diffusive flux estimator (NDFE) to that of the linear, quadratic, and steady-state diffusion models that are widely cited in the literature, determined its sensitivity to violation of the primary assumptions on which it is based, and addressed some of the practicalities of its application. In sharp contrast to the other models, NDFE proved an accurate and robust estimator of trace gas emissions across a wide range of soil, chamber design, and deployment scenarios.

Abbreviations: H–M–P, Hutchinson–Mosier–Pedersen • NDFE, non-steady-state diffusive flux estimator • NSS, non-steady state

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. Hossler and V. Bouchard The Joint Estimation of Soil Trace Gas Fluxes Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., August 20, 2008; 72(5): 1382 - 1393. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. T. Venterea and J. M. Baker Effects of Soil Physical Nonuniformity on Chamber-Based Gas Flux Estimates Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., August 20, 2008; 72(5): 1410 - 1417. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]