HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kay, B. D. Articles by Dharmakeerthi, R. S. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Kay, B. D. Articles by Dharmakeerthi, R. S. Agricola Articles by Kay, B. D. Articles by Dharmakeerthi, R. S. Related Collections Nutrient Management Plant Analysis

Nutrient Management & Soil & Plant Analysis

Integrating Soil and Weather Data to Describe Variability in Plant Available Nitrogen

^a Dep. of Land Resource Science, Univ. of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1 Canada
^b Dep. of Soil Science, Univ. of Bu–Ali Sina, Hamadan, Iran
^c Dep. of Soils and Plant Nutrition, Rubber Research Institute of Sri Lanka, Dartonfield, Agalawatta, Sri Lanka

^* Corresponding author (bkay{at}lrs.uoguelph.ca)

Although there are economic and environmental reasons to manage fertilizer-nitrogen (N) more effectively in variable landscapes, the impact of weather and its interaction with soil properties/landscape attributes or management practices has received little attention. The objectives of this study were to assess the magnitude of temporal and spatial variability in soil and plant N in a variable landscape under different management practices and to assess the dependence of their temporal variability on readily available weather variables such as air temperature and rainfall. The experiment was conducted from 1997 to 2003 on a simple slope under three maize (Zea mays L.) based cropping systems. Soil and shoot N were measured through the growing season and the sum used as a measure of plant available N (PAN). Values of PAN varied with year, treatment, landscape position, and year x treatment and year x treatment x position interaction terms. The effects were quantified for each management treatment using multiple regression analyses to relate PAN to soil organic carbon (OC), cumulative degree days (CDD), and cumulative rainfall (CRF) in different periods within the growing season. Plant Available Nitrogen was most strongly influenced by rainfall early in the growing season and exhibited a nonlinear response to OC and CRF. The regression model predicted spatial patterns that were generally stable when applied to historical weather data; PAN increased with OC in 12 of the 15 yr. The analyses illustrate the feasibility of combining soils and weather data to predict N dynamics in variable landscapes.

Abbreviations: CDD, cumulative degree days • CRF, cumulative rainfall • CV, coefficient of variation • DOY, day of year • N, nitrogen • NLWR, non-limiting water range • NRMSE, normalized root mean square error • OC, organic carbon • PAN, plant available N • RMSE, root mean square error • SMN, soil mineral N • Till, tillage treatment • VCE, variance component estimate • WFPS, water-filled pore space