HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Liu, T.-L. Articles by Lee, D.-Y. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Liu, T.-L. Articles by Lee, D.-Y. Agricola Articles by Liu, T.-L. Articles by Lee, D.-Y. Related Collections Geostatistics Spatial Variability Site-Specific Analysis

Nutrient Management & Soil & Plant Analysis

Interpolating Soil Properties Using Kriging Combined with Categorical Information of Soil Maps

^a Graduate Institute of Agric. Chemistry, National Taiwan Univ., 106 Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C.
^b Dep. of Post-Modern Agriculture, MingDao Univ., 523 Pitou, Changhua, Taiwan, R.O.C

^* Corresponding author (dylee{at}ccms.ntu.edu.tw)

Kriging interpolation is frequently used for mapping soil properties in the analysis and interpretation of spatial variation of soil. Mapping quality could affect the performance of site-specific management. Soil map–delineation in existing soil maps showing abrupt changes at the boundaries between different soil types can provide valuable categorical information for interpreting variation in soil properties. In this study, map units were used to group sampled observations, and the variation in soil properties was separated into two parts: (i) between soil types (i.e., soil type effect) and (ii) within each soil type (i.e., residual). A kriging model combined with soil map–delineation, taking into account the variation components of soil type effect and residual, was proposed. A comparison of performance of kriging combined with soil map–delineation (KSMD) and ordinary kriging (OK) was performed to assess the feasibility of KSMD for improving the interpolation of soil properties. Real data of soil properties (sand, silt, and clay contents; pH; and Mehlich-3 Ca and P) in a field of midwestern Taiwan were used for illustration. The analysis of variance table revealed that the contribution of soil types is a significant source of the spatial variation of soil. The spatial variation components of soil type effect and residual were thus determined for KSMD. When comparing KSMD and OK, the mean errors of KSMD and OK estimations were similar. However, decreases in estimation of imprecision for KSMD relative to OK (DIP %) for the 127 validation locations for sand, silt, and clay contents; pH; and Mehlich-3 Ca and P were 34, 40, 48, 20, 42, and 3%, respectively. These results suggested that the proposed KSMD method could use the information of soil map–delineation to increase precision of the interpolation of soil properties.

Abbreviations: DIP %, decrease of estimation imprecision of KSMD relative to OK • IP, imprecision • KSMD, kriging combined with soil map–delineation • ME, mean error • OK, ordinary kriging • RMSE, root mean squared error