SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 23 May 2006
Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 70:1145-1154 (2006)
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2005.0151
© 2006 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brye, K. R.
Right arrow Articles by Gbur, E. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Brye, K. R.
Right arrow Articles by Gbur, E. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Brye, K. R.
Right arrow Articles by Gbur, E. E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Tillage
Right arrow Residue management
Right arrow Crop Rotation Systems

Soil & Water Management & Conservation

Impact of Tillage and Residue Burning on Carbon Dioxide Flux in a Wheat–Soybean Production System

Kristofor R. Brye*, David E. Longer and Edward E. Gbur

Univ. of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701

* Corresponding author (kbrye{at}uark.edu)

Burning of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) residue followed by plowing is a common management practice in wheat–soybean [Glycine Max (L.) Merrill] production systems in the mid-southern USA. However, this residue management practice is not environmentally friendly and may not be sustainable. The objectives of this study were to (i) evaluate the effects of N fertilization of wheat, residue burning, and tillage on soil surface carbon dioxide (CO2) flux in a wheat–soybean double-crop production system, and (ii) evaluate the role of soil temperature and soil moisture in controlling CO2 flux in a relatively warm, subhumid environment. Soil surface CO2 flux was measured nine times between June 2002 and October 2003 during the soybean growing season under all combinations of conventional- (CT) and no-tillage (NT) at high and low N fertilization levels with and without residue burning at two locations in the Mississippi River delta region of eastern Arkansas. Soil surface CO2 flux was 37.6% higher (P < 0.01) from CT than from NT and 6.1% higher (P < 0.05) from the low than the high N rate treatment at one location, but not at the other. Burning did not affect soil surface CO2 flux except for a significant burning x N rate (P = 0.016) and burning x time interaction (P = 0.032) at one location, but not at the other. Both soil temperature and moisture parameters were significantly negatively correlated with temperature-normalized soil surface CO2 flux, but soil temperature, particularly at the 10-cm depth, explained more of the variation than did soil moisture parameters. The results of this study indicate that tillage and N fertilization of prior wheat, but not residue burning, affect the loss of C as CO2 from the soil and that there are additional soil and/or environmental factors, other than near-surface soil moisture and temperature fluctuations, perhaps microbial biomass, that contribute to controlling soil surface CO2 flux in wheat-soybean production systems in the subhumid region of southern USA.

Abbreviations: ASPB, Arkansas Soybean Promotion Board • CBES, Cotton Branch Experiment Station • CT, conventional tillage • CTIC, Conventional Tillage Information Center • IPCC, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change • NT, no-tillage • NOAA, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration • OM, organic matter • PTBS, Pine Tree Branch Experiment Station • VWC, volumetric water content • WFPS, water-filled pore space







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 2006 by the Soil Science Society of America.