|
|
||||||||
Dep. of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, Univ. of Illinois, N215 Turner Hall, 1102 S. Goodwin Ave., Urbana, IL 61801
* Corresponding author (gayoung.yoo{at}gmail.com)
The influence of tillage practices on soil organic carbon (SOC) dynamics is manifested indirectly through the modification of soil structure. This study was conducted at two sites in Illinois where long-term use of conventional (CT) and no tillage (NT) practices has increased SOC at Monmouth, a silt loam, but not at DeKalb, a silty clay loam soil with higher SOC contents. We evaluated whether soil structural quality could be related to observed SOC mineralization and explain the inconsistent influence of tillage on SOC stocks. Soil physical parameters and soil CO2 evolution rates were measured in 2000, 2001, and 2002. At DeKalb, there was no difference in the mean (µmol m1 s1) or specific (µgCO2 s1/µg SOC) SOC mineralization rates of NT and CT soils. In Monmouth, mean and specific SOC mineralization rates were greater from soils under CT than NT management. This indicates use of NT practices had increased physical protection of SOC at that site. The Q10 equation, which is based on soil temperature and moisture, better explained CO2 efflux in DeKalb than in Monmouth. The poorer fit of the equation in Monmouth reflects its reliance on gravimetric moisture content, which inadequately describes the status of soil water influencing heterotrophic activity. The least limiting water range (LLWR), which integrates the affects of clay content, bulk density, and soil moisture on biological activity and predicted observed soil CO2 efflux patterns (R = 0.600, p = 0.0025) better than any other physical parameter, indicated use of NT practices at Monmouth increased soil compaction or strength enough to reduce C mineralization. In DeKalb, where soils have an inherently high capacity to protect SOC from decay, tillage has had no influence on SOC dynamics. The variable affect of tillage practices on C sequestration were explained by soil physical properties.
Abbreviations: CT, conventional fall tillage LLWR, least limiting water range NT, no tillage SOC, soil organic carbon
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Sharifi, B. J. Zebarth, D. L. Burton, C. A. Grant, S. Bittman, C. F. Drury, B. G. McConkey, and N. Ziadi Response of Potentially Mineralizable Soil Nitrogen and Indices of Nitrogen Availability to Tillage System Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., June 18, 2008; 72(4): 1124 - 1131. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Yoo and M. M. Wander Tillage Effects on Aggregate Turnover and Sequestration of Particulate and Humified Soil Organic Carbon Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., May 1, 2008; 72(3): 670 - 676. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Yoo, T. M. Nissen, and M. M. Wander Use of physical properties to predict the effects of tillage practices on organic matter dynamics in three illinois soils. J. Environ. Qual., July 1, 2006; 35(4): 1576 - 1583. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| The SCI Journals | Agronomy Journal | Crop Science | |||
| Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education |
Vadose Zone Journal | ||||
| Journal of Plant Registrations | Journal of Environmental Quality |
The Plant Genome | |||