SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 27 February 2006
Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 70:555-569 (2006)
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2004.0347
© 2006 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (48)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Six, J.
Right arrow Articles by Batten, K. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Six, J.
Right arrow Articles by Batten, K. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Six, J.
Right arrow Articles by Batten, K. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Biogeochemical Processes
Right arrow Carbon Sequestration
Right arrow Microbial Processes

Soil Biology & Biochemistry

Bacterial and Fungal Contributions to Carbon Sequestration in Agroecosystems

J. Sixa,*, S. D. Freyb, R. K. Thietb and K. M. Battena

a Dep. of Plant Sciences, Univ. of California, Davis, CA 95616
b Dep. of Natural Resources, Univ. of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824

* Corresponding author (jwsix{at}ucdavis.edu)

This paper reviews the current knowledge of microbial processes affecting C sequestration in agroecosystems. The microbial contribution to soil C storage is directly related to microbial community dynamics and the balance between formation and degradation of microbial byproducts. Soil microbes also indirectly influence C cycling by improving soil aggregation, which physically protects soil organic matter (SOM). Consequently, the microbial contribution to C sequestration is governed by the interactions between the amount of microbial biomass, microbial community structure, microbial byproducts, and soil properties such as texture, clay mineralogy, pore-size distribution, and aggregate dynamics. The capacity of a soil to protect microbial biomass and microbially derived organic matter (MOM) is directly and/or indirectly (i.e., through physical protection by aggregates) related to the reactive properties of clays. However, the stabilization of MOM in the soil is also related to the efficiency with which microorganisms utilize substrate C and the chemical nature of the byproducts they produce. Crop rotations, reduced or no-tillage practices, organic farming, and cover crops increase total microbial biomass and shift the community structure toward a more fungal-dominated community, thereby enhancing the accumulation of MOM. A quantitative and qualitative improvement of SOM is generally observed in agroecosystems favoring a fungal-dominated community, but the mechanisms leading to this improvement are not completely understood. Gaps within our knowledge on MOM-C dynamics and how they are related to soil properties and agricultural practices are identified.

Abbreviations: CT, conventional tillage • LF, light fraction • MAP, mean annual precipitation • MAT, mean annual temperature • MGE, microbial growth efficiency • MOM, microbially derived organic matter • MT, minimum tillage • NT, no-tillage • POM, plant-derived organic matter • SOM, soil organic matter




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
R. Rinnan and E. Baath
Differential Utilization of Carbon Substrates by Bacteria and Fungi in Tundra Soil
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., June 1, 2009; 75(11): 3611 - 3620.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
J. Rousk, P. C. Brookes, and E. Baath
Contrasting Soil pH Effects on Fungal and Bacterial Growth Suggest Functional Redundancy in Carbon Mineralization
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., March 15, 2009; 75(6): 1589 - 1596.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
R. F. Follett, G. E. Varvel, J. M. Kimble, and K. P. Vogel
No-Till Corn after Bromegrass: Effect on Soil Carbon and Soil Aggregates
Agron. J., February 4, 2009; 101(2): 261 - 268.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
B. L. Helgason, F. L. Walley, and J. J. Germida
Fungal and Bacterial Abundance in Long-Term No-Till and Intensive-Till Soils of the Northern Great Plains
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 21, 2009; 73(1): 120 - 127.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
P. M. White and C. W. Rice
Tillage Effects on Microbial and Carbon Dynamics during Plant Residue Decomposition
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 21, 2009; 73(1): 138 - 145.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
G. B. Triplett Jr. and W. A. Dick
No-Tillage Crop Production: A Revolution in Agriculture!
Agron. J., May 7, 2008; 100(Supplement_3): S-153 - S-165.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
H. Minoshima, L. E. Jackson, T. R. Cavagnaro, and H. Ferris
Short-Term Fates of Carbon-13-Depleted Cowpea Shoots in No-Till and Standard Tillage Soils
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., October 29, 2007; 71(6): 1859 - 1866.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
H. Minoshima, L.E. Jackson, T.R. Cavagnaro, S. Sanchez-Moreno, H. Ferris, S.R. Temple, S. Goyal, and J.P. Mitchell
Soil Food Webs and Carbon Dynamics in Response to Conservation Tillage in California
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., May 16, 2007; 71(3): 952 - 963.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2006 by the Soil Science Society of America.