HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Nemes, A. Articles by Pachepsky, Y. A. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Nemes, A. Articles by Pachepsky, Y. A. Agricola Articles by Nemes, A. Articles by Pachepsky, Y. A. Related Collections Soil Physics Pedotransfer Functions Soil Hydrology

Soil Physics

Use of the Nonparametric Nearest Neighbor Approach to Estimate Soil Hydraulic Properties

^a Dep. of Environmental Sciences, Univ. of California, Riverside, CA 92521
^b USDA-ARS Hydrology and Remote Sensing Lab., 10300 Baltimore Ave., Bldg. 007, BARC-West, Beltsville, MD 20705
^c USDA-ARS Environmental Microbial Safety Lab., Powder Mill Road, Bldg. 173, BARC-East, Beltsville, MD 20705

^* Corresponding author (anemes{at}hydrolab.arsusda.gov).

Nonparametric approaches are being used in various fields to address classification type problems, as well as to estimate continuous variables. One type of the nonparametric lazy learning algorithms, a k-nearest neighbor (k-NN) algorithm has been applied to estimate water retention at –33- and –1500-kPa matric potentials. Performance of the algorithm has subsequently been tested against estimations made by a neural network (NNet) model, developed using the same data and input soil attributes. We used a hierarchical set of inputs using soil texture, bulk density (D_b), and organic matter (OM) content to avoid possible bias toward one set of inputs, and varied the size of the data set used to develop the NNet models and to run the k-NN estimation algorithms. Different ‘design-parameter’ settings, analogous to model parameters have been optimized. The k-NN technique showed little sensitivity to potential suboptimal settings in terms of how many nearest soils were selected and how those were weighed while formulating the output of the algorithm, as long as extremes were avoided. The optimal settings were, however, dependent on the size of the development/reference data set. The nonparametric k-NN technique performed mostly equally well with the NNet models, in terms of root-mean-squared residuals (RMSRs) and mean residuals (MRs). Gradual reduction of the data set size from 1600 to 100 resulted in only a slight loss of accuracy for both the k-NN and NNet approaches. The k-NN technique is a competitive alternative to other techniques to develop pedotransfer functions (PTFs), especially since redevelopment of PTFs is not necessarily needed as new data become available.

Abbreviations: D_b, bulk density • k-NN, k-nearest neighbor technique • MR, mean residual • NNet, neural network • OM, organic matter • PTF, pedotransfer function • RMSR, root-mean-squared residual • SSC, sand, silt, and clay contents (soil texture) • WRC, water retention curve

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Nemes, W. J. Rawls, Ya. A. Pachepsky, and M. Th. van Genuchten Sensitivity Analysis of the Nonparametric Nearest Neighbor Technique to Estimate Soil Water Retention Vadose Zone J., November 20, 2006; 5(4): 1222 - 1235. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]