SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 29 September 2005
Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 69:1806-1812 (2005)
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2004.0237
© 2005 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ringrose, C.
Right arrow Articles by Neilsen, W. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ringrose, C.
Right arrow Articles by Neilsen, W. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Ringrose, C.
Right arrow Articles by Neilsen, W. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Soil Fertility and Productivity
Right arrow Frozen Soils
Right arrow Nitrogen

Forest, Range & Wildland Soils

Growth Response of Eucalyptus regnans and Soil Changes following Periodic Fertilization

C. Ringrosea,b,* and W. A. Neilsena

a Forestry Tasmania, 79 Melville Street, Hobart, Tasmania, 7000, Australia
b Cooperative Research Centre for Sustainable Production Forestry, GPO Box 252-12, Hobart 7001 Australia

* Corresponding author (carolyn.ringrose{at}forestrytas.com.au)

Increased demand for plantation hardwood production has resulted in the progression of Eucalyptus plantations onto soils of reasonable physical structure but low nutrient status. This study was undertaken to investigate the effects of periodic fertilization through 15 yr on stand growth and soil chemistry of a Eucalyptus regnans F. Mueller plantation on a high rainfall site in southern Tasmania. Substantial response to N fertilizer, applied as ammonium sulfate, were measured, but there was no response to P applied as single superphosphate, either alone or in combination with N. Annual applications of N fertilizer, for a period of 13 yr, at 100 kg N ha–1 yr–1 doubled volume growth from 125 to 281 m3 ha–1, at Age 19 yr. Long-term fertilization resulted in the accumulation of nutrients within the forest floor and surface soils. Significant reductions in soil pH, from 4.5 to 3.6 in the surface soil, were associated with the highest rate of fertilization. Reductions in pH occurred with both nitrogenous and phosphatic fertilizers. Substantial reductions in exchangeable Mg concentrations in surface soils, from 258 to 71 mg kg–1 were also measured. The research highlights the balance needed between obtaining growth response and causing detrimental soil effects from long-term fertilization.

Abbreviations: N2Y, ammonium sulfate applied every second year • NIL, nil treatment • P1YN1Y, superphosphate and ammonium sulfate applied annually • P2Y, superphosphate applied every second year • P2YN2Y, superphosphate and ammonium sulfate applied every second year • P4YN4Y, superphosphate and ammonium sulfate applied every fourth year • PAI, periodic annual increment




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
C. Perdomo, J. Duran, and P. Llovet
Soil and Plant Indices for Predicting Eucalypt Response to Nitrogen in Uruguay
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., September 28, 2007; 71(6): 1708 - 1718.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 2005 by the Soil Science Society of America.