|
|
||||||||
Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Dep. of Agroecology, Research Centre Foulum, PO Box 50, 8830 Tjele, Denmark
* Corresponding author (peter.sorensen{at}agrsci.dk)
Separation of slurry by centrifugation concentrates nutrients and facilitates the transport of surplus nutrients away from livestock farms. Nitrogen-15 labeled pig slurries containing urine 15N or fecal 15N were produced to compare the utilization and fate of N in separated and unseparated pig slurry. There was good agreement between the mineral fertilizer equivalence (MFE) of manure fractions estimated from 15N uptake and by a traditional non-isotopic method, but the 15N method was more precise. The weighted utilization of N in separated slurry was similar to the N utilization in unseparated slurry. The MFE of slurry total N was 75 to 79% after incorporation before sowing spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) and 59 to 64% after surface application in winter wheat (Tritium aestivum L.). Both the origin of the slurry N and the fractionation influenced the N availability. The uptake of urinary 15N in the first barley crop was 35 to 53% and the uptake of fecal 15N 21 to 44% with the lowest availability of 15N in the dry-matter-rich fraction (DMR). The uptake of 15N in the following cover crop and barley crop was low (14.5%). The residual N effect of the manures in the year after application (MFE) was equivalent to 1% for the liquid fraction, 3% for the slurry, and 5% for the DMR. The amount of 15N remaining in soil 15 mo after application was 30 to 53% for urinary N and 44 to 61% for fecal N. It is concluded that the overall utilization of N is unaffected by slurry separation, but the separation facilitates a better distribution of nutrients.
Abbreviations: ANI, added-nitrogen interaction DMR, dry-matter-rich fraction LIQ, liquid fraction MFE, mineral fertilizer equivalence
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. H. Chantigny, D. A. Angers, G. Belanger, P. Rochette, N. Eriksen-Hamel, S. Bittman, K. Buckley, D. Masse, and M.-O. Gasser Yield and Nutrient Export of Grain Corn Fertilized with Raw and Treated Liquid Swine Manure Agron. J., August 11, 2008; 100(5): 1303 - 1309. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. H. Chantigny, D. A. Angers, P. Rochette, G. Belanger, D. Masse, and D. Cote Gaseous Nitrogen Emissions and Forage Nitrogen Uptake on Soils Fertilized with Raw and Treated Swine Manure J. Environ. Qual., October 24, 2007; 36(6): 1864 - 1872. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Sorensen and I. K. Thomsen Production of Nitrogen-15-Labeled Pig Manure for Nitrogen Cycling Studies Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., August 25, 2005; 69(5): 1639 - 1643. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| The SCI Journals | Agronomy Journal | Crop Science | |||
| Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education |
Vadose Zone Journal | ||||
| Journal of Plant Registrations | Journal of Environmental Quality |
The Plant Genome | |||