SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 25 August 2005
Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 69:1609-1616 (2005)
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2004.0312
© 2005 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rachman, A.
Right arrow Articles by Gantzer, C. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Rachman, A.
Right arrow Articles by Gantzer, C. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Rachman, A.
Right arrow Articles by Gantzer, C. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Tomography
Right arrow Fractal Approaches
Right arrow Macroporous/Aggregated Media

Soil & Water Management & Conservation

Computed-Tomographic Measurement of Soil Macroporosity Parameters as Affected by Stiff-Stemmed Grass Hedges

Achmad Rachmana, S. H. Andersonb,* and C. J. Gantzerb

a Indonesia Center for Soil and Agroclimate Research and Development, Jl. Ir. H. Juanda 98 Bogor, Indonesia 16123
b 302 Anheuser-Busch Natural Resources Building, Dep. of Soil, Environmental and Atmospheric Sciences, Univ. of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211

* Corresponding author (AndersonS{at}missouri.edu)

Planting stiff-stemmed grass hedges in a watershed may reduce water runoff and soil erosion, in part by altering soil macroporosity. The objective of this study was to characterize macroporosity of soils under a perennial grass hedge system for 12 yr using x-ray computed tomography (CT) and to compare CT-macroporosity results with macroporosity estimated from water retention data. Three positions were sampled: grass hedge position, deposition zone position 0.5 m upslope from grass hedges, and row crop position 7 m upslope from the hedges. Intact core samples (76 mm x 76 mm) were collected from two depths, 0 to 100 and 100 to 200 mm, with five replicates per position per depth. Number of pores (macro- and meso-), averaged across depths, in the grass hedge were nearly 2.5 times greater than those in the row crop and five times greater than in the deposition positions; however their circularity was 8.8% lower than in the row crop and 2.6% lower than in the deposition positions. The CT-measured macroporosity was significantly greater (P < 0.01) for the grass hedge position (0.056 m3 m–3) as compared with the row crop (0.014 m3 m–3) and deposition positions (0.006 m3 m–3). The fractal dimension (D) was significantly greater (P < 0.01) for the grass hedge position (D = 1.56) than in the row crop (D = 1.31) and the deposition (D = 1.12) positions. The values of all measured pore characteristics decreased with depth. Computed tomography-measured macroporosity data were comparable with macroporosity estimated from water retention data. These findings suggest that grass hedge systems have created more pores and a greater volume of macroporosity.

Abbreviations: CT, computed tomography • D, fractal dimension • RAV, relative attenuation value




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
S. S. Lee, C. J. Gantzer, A. L. Thompson, S. H. Anderson, and R. A. Ketcham
Using High-Resolution Computed Tomography Analysis To Characterize Soil-Surface Seals
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., August 20, 2008; 72(5): 1478 - 1485.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Soil and Water ConservationHome page
S. Kumar, S.H. Anderson, L.G. Bricknell, R.P. Udawatta, and C.J. Gantzer
Soil hydraulic properties influenced by agroforestry and grass buffers for grazed pasture systems
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, July 1, 2008; 63(4): 224 - 232.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
R. P. Udawatta, C. J. Gantzer, S. H. Anderson, and H. E. Garrett
Agroforestry and Grass Buffer Effects on Pore Characteristics Measured by High-Resolution X-ray Computed Tomography
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 25, 2008; 72(2): 295 - 304.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
R. P. Udawatta, S. H. Anderson, C. J. Gantzer, and H. E. Garrett
Influence of Prairie Restoration on CT-Measured Soil Pore Characteristics
J. Environ. Qual., January 4, 2008; 37(1): 219 - 228.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
R. P. Udawatta, S. H. Anderson, C. J. Gantzer, and H. E. Garrett
Agroforestry and Grass Buffer Influence on Macropore Characteristics: A Computed Tomography Analysis
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., August 22, 2006; 70(5): 1763 - 1773.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2005 by the Soil Science Society of America.