SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 4 August 2005
Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 69:1482-1491 (2005)
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2004.0377
© 2005 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Drohan, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Buck, B. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Drohan, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Buck, B. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Drohan, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Buck, B. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Ecosystem Management
Right arrow Dryland Soils
Right arrow Soil Chemistry

Forest, Range & Wildland Soils

Suitability of the Plant Root Simulator Probe for Use in the Mojave Desert

P. J. Drohana,*, D. J. Merklerb and B. J. Bucka

a University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Dep. of Geoscience, 4505 Maryland Parkway, Las Vegas, NV 89154-4010
b NRCS, Resource Soil Scientist, 5820 South Pecos Rd., Bldg. A, Suite 400, Las Vegas, Nevada 89120

* Corresponding author (drohanp{at}unlv.nevada.edu)

To find a quick, relatively inexpensive measure for soil chemistry in the Mojave Desert (MD), we evaluated the use of the ion-exchange resin membrane (IEM) plant root simulator (PRS) probe. Tests were conducted along a floodplain of the Virgin River in Nevada. Probes were buried at 15 and 40 cm. Probes were left in place for three time intervals (30, 60, and 90 d) in two seasonal periods (wetter [WP] and drier [DP], 2004), which were delineated according to the amount of precipitation and soil temperature and moisture. The sampling design was replicated in three pits during the WP and DP. Soil moisture and soil temperature were monitored at 25, 50, 75, and 100 cm. The probes were able to detect differences in ion sorption between the two burial depths, although differences were not always statistically significant. Ion sorption onto the probes generally increased from Month 1 to 3, but the result was not linear. The sorption of some ions fluctuated during the three-month period, with ions desorbing and readsorbing or ion chemistry decreasing over the course of the study. Soil moisture and temperature did not appear to affect the probe's ability to detect differences across depths or season. Based on results from this experiment, we conclude that the burial time required for assessing relative differences in ion chemistries at our sites is one month or less and that the PRS probe may be useful for detecting relative differences in ion chemistries among other soils in the MD.

Abbreviations: CEC, cation exchange capacity • DP, dry period • EC, electrical conductivity • EDS, energy dispersive spectroscopy • IEM, ion-exchange membrane • MD, Mojave Desert • PRS, plant root simulator • SAR, sodium adsorption ratio • SEM, scanning electron microscopy • WAI, Western Ag Innovations • WP, wet period







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2005 by the Soil Science Society of America.