HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Thompson, J. A. Articles by Kolka, R. K. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Thompson, J. A. Articles by Kolka, R. K. GeoRef GeoRef Citation Agricola Articles by Thompson, J. A. Articles by Kolka, R. K. Related Collections Carbon Sequestration Forest Soils Spatial Distribution

Pedology

Soil Carbon Storage Estimation in a Forested Watershed using Quantitative Soil-Landscape Modeling

^a Division of Plant and Soil Sciences, West Virginia Univ., Morgantown, WV 26506-6108
^b USDA Forest Service-North Central Research Station, Grand Rapids, MN 55744-3399

^* Corresponding author (james.thompson{at}mail.wvu.edu)

Carbon storage in soils is important to forest ecosystems. Moreover, forest soils may serve as important C sinks for ameliorating excess atmospheric CO₂. Spatial estimates of soil organic C (SOC) storage have traditionally relied upon soil survey maps and laboratory characterization data. This approach does not account for inherent variability within map units, and often relies on incomplete, unrepresentative, or biased data. Our objective was to develop soil-landscape models that quantify relationships between SOC and topographic variables derived from digital elevation models. Within a 1500-ha watershed in eastern Kentucky, the amount of SOC stored in the soil to a depth of 0.3 m was estimated using triplicate cores at each node of a 380-m grid. We stratified the data into four aspect classes and used robust linear regression to generate empirical models. Despite low coefficients of correlation between measured SOC and individual terrain attributes, we developed and validated models that explain up to 71% of SOC variability using three to five terrain attributes. Mean SOC content in the upper 30 cm, as predicted from our models, is 5.3 kg m^–2, compared with an estimate of 2.9 kg m^–2 from soil survey data. Total SOC storage in the upper 30 cm within the entire watershed is 82.0 Gg, compared with an estimate of 44.8 Gg from soil survey data. A soil-landscape modeling approach may prove useful for future SOC spatial modeling because it incorporates the continuous variability of SOC across landscapes and may be transportable to similar landscapes.

Abbreviations: CFI, continuous forest inventory • DEM, digital elevation model • SOC, soil organic carbon

This article has been cited by other articles:

				F. Chen, D. E. Kissel, L. T. West, W. Adkins, D. Rickman, and J. C. Luvall Mapping Soil Organic Carbon Concentration for Multiple Fields with Image Similarity Analysis Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 11, 2008; 72(1): 186 - 193. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. Yadav and G. Malanson Progress in soil organic matter research: litter decomposition, modelling, monitoring and sequestration Progress in Physical Geography, April 1, 2007; 31(2): 131 - 154. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. L. Jespersen and L. J. Osher Carbon Storage in the Soils of a Mesotidal Gulf of Maine Estuary Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., March 12, 2007; 71(2): 372 - 379. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]