SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Haering, K. C.
Right arrow Articles by Galbraith, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Haering, K. C.
Right arrow Articles by Galbraith, J. M.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Haering, K. C.
Right arrow Articles by Galbraith, J. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Pedology
Published in Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 69:463-472 (2005).
© 2005 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA

Division S-5—Pedology

Mapping and Classification of Southwest Virginia Mine Soils

Kathryn C. Haering, W. Lee Daniels* and John M. Galbraith

Dep. of Crop and Soil Environmental Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State Univ., Blacksburg, VA, 24061-0404

* Corresponding author (wdaniels{at}vt.edu)

Mine soils on central Appalachian coal-mined lands are currently classified by the Soil Taxonomy as Typic Udorthents, which does not distinguish these unique anthropogenic soils from other weakly developed natural soils. Our overall objectives were (i) to critically evaluate currently available USDA-NRCS mine soil series for classifying a range of mine soil pedons in southwest Virginia, and (ii) to compare two different approaches for detailed Order 1 soil mapping of these highly altered landscapes. Using established series concepts, we mapped and classified 450 ha of mine soils in an area that had been recently reclaimed, and we used these same series concepts to reclassify mine soils in an older adjacent and overlapping 250-ha mine area that had been mapped using nontaxonomic mine soil classification criteria in 1980. Established mine soil series provided adequate information on particle-size and reaction class, but did not adequately describe drainage class, rock type, or parent materials. Classification differences occurred on well-drained soils primarily at the family level and below. There are no established series that describe mine soils with impeded drainage, densic layers, and shallow or moderately deep depth classes, all of which commonly occurred in this study area, and are important criteria for separating soil series. Cambic horizons were also described, and generate classification issues at the order level. Because reaction class, drainage class, densic contacts, and soil depth directly affect soil management, we feel that it is important to recognize these features by establishing new mine soil series or phases of established series. Detailed Order 1 map scales (≤1:12000) are required to adequately resolve and delineate strongly contrasting mine soil landscapes, particularly on older (pre-1977) mined lands.

Abbreviations: SCS, Soil Conservation Service • SMCRA, Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2005 by the Soil Science Society of America.