SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hassett, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Zak, D. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hassett, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Zak, D. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Hassett, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Zak, D. R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Ecosystem Management
Right arrow Soil Microbiology
Right arrow Microorganisms
Right arrow Microbial Processes
Right arrow Forest Soils
Published in Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 69:227-235 (2005).
© 2005 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA

Division S-7—Forest, Range, & Wildland Soils

Aspen Harvest Intensity Decreases Microbial Biomass, Extracellular Enzyme Activity, and Soil Nitrogen Cycling

John E. Hassett and Donald R. Zak*

School of Natural Resources & Environment, Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1115

* Corresponding author (drzak{at}umich.edu).

Forest harvesting alters plant litter inputs to soil and modifies the soil environment, which could alter the composition and function of soil microbial communities. Harvest-induced reductions in microbial activity could eventually feed back to modify soil N availability and forest productivity. We reasoned that increasing harvest intensity should decrease microbial community biomass and function via reduced litter input to soil. We further expected microbial communities to differ in response to harvest intensity in aspen-dominated (Populus tremuloides Michx. and P. grandidentata Michx.) forests located in climatically and edaphically different conditions. To test these ideas, we quantified microbial community composition and function 8 to 10 yr following harvest in two climatically and edaphically distinct aspen-dominated forests in Michigan. Harvest treatments included control (no harvest), merchantable bole harvest (MBH), total tree harvest (TTH), and total tree harvest + forest floor removal (FFR). Microbial community composition was quantified using phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) analysis, and microbial community function was assayed using extracellular enzyme activity and 15N pool dilution. All harvest methods reduced microbial biomass (–24%), the activity of extracellular enzymes involved with litter decomposition (–10 to –30%), gross N mineralization (–36%), and microbial N immobilization (–38%), regardless of climatic and edaphic differences between stand locations. Microbial community composition was not affected by harvest treatment, nor did it differ between locations. Lower rates of extracellular enzyme activity and gross N transformation in harvested aspen stands corresponded with a reduction in microbial biomass, which in turn may be driven by reduced litter input and changes in soil microclimate following clear-cut harvest.

Abbreviations: FAME, fatty acid methyl ester • FFR, total tree harvest + forest floor removal • L-DOPA, L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine • MBH, merchantable bole harvest • MUB, methylumbelliferone • PLFA, phospholipid fatty acid • TTH, total tree harvest




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
N. R. Smith, B. E. Kishchuk, and W. W. Mohn
Effects of Wildfire and Harvest Disturbances on Forest Soil Bacterial Communities
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., January 1, 2008; 74(1): 216 - 224.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
J. M. Kranabetter, P. Sanborn, B. K. Chapman, and S. Dube
The Contrasting Response to Soil Disturbance between Lodgepole Pine and Hybrid White Spruce in Subboreal Forests
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., August 3, 2006; 70(5): 1591 - 1599.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
A. Belleau, S. Brais, and D. Pare
Soil Nutrient Dynamics after Harvesting and Slash Treatments in Boreal Aspen Stands
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., May 23, 2006; 70(4): 1189 - 1199.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2005 by the Soil Science Society of America.