HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Siegel-Issem, C. M. Articles by Patterson, S. C. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Siegel-Issem, C. M. Articles by Patterson, S. C. Agricola Articles by Siegel-Issem, C. M. Articles by Patterson, S. C. Related Collections Forest Soils Soil Compaction Root Growth

Division S-7—Forest, Range, & Wildland Soils

Seedling Root Growth as a Function of Soil Density and Water Content

^a Dep. of Forestry (0324), Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24060 USA
^b USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, 2400 Washington Ave, Redding, CA 96001
^c USDA Forest Service, North Central Research Station, Lincoln University, Foster Hall, Room 208, Jefferson City, MO 65102
^d MeadWestvaco Corp., Forest Science Lab, Box WV, 180 Westvaco Rd. Summerville, SC 29483

^* Corresponding author (csiegel{at}vt.edu)

Compaction caused by some intensive forest management practices can reduce tree growth, but growth reduction is the result of complex interactions between soil properties and tree physiological processes, which may differ by species. We used a 7 by 7 factorial greenhouse experiment to create a matrix of bulk density (_b) and volumetric water content (_v) to better understand soil compaction effects on seedling growth of: (i) ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa var. ponderosa Dougl. ex Laws) grown on Dome and Cohasset soils; (ii) shortleaf pine (Pinus echinata Mill.) on a Clarksville soil; and (iii) loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) on an Argent soil. Models of root length density (RLD) were developed using multiple regression. The general model of RLD = b₀ + b_1v + b_{2 b} + b₃²_v described rooting response for the Clarksville-shortleaf and Argent-loblolly soil–species combinations (p = 0.005). However, the ponderosa pine RLD response on Cohasset soil was linear and there was an interaction between _v and _b in the Dome soil. Shoot mass of seedlings growing within the least limiting water range (LLWR) was greater than those growing outside the range for all soil–species combinations except the Argent-loblolly pine (p = 0.05). The loblolly pines had greater shoot mass at _v above the upper LLWR limits (aeration limiting). Least limiting water range has potential as a soil quality indicator, but seedling response was not always associated with LLWR. Root length density (RLD) response surface models in conjunction with seasonal site water data have potential for determining compaction-induced soil limitations for tree growth, but need to be field tested and calibrated for both soil and species.

Abbreviations: LLWR, least limiting water range • LTSP, USDA Forest Service Long-Term Soil Productivity Study • NLWR, nonlimiting water range • OWC, optimum soil water content • RLD, root length density • SWRC, soil water retention curves • _b, bulk density • _v, volumetric water content

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. Blanco-Canqui and R. Lal Regional Assessment of Soil Compaction and Structural Properties under No-tillage Farming Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., September 28, 2007; 71(6): 1770 - 1778. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]