HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (9) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kissel, D. E. Articles by Morris, L. A. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Kissel, D. E. Articles by Morris, L. A. Agricola Articles by Kissel, D. E. Articles by Morris, L. A. Related Collections Nitrogen Nutrients Nutrient Cycling Nutrient Management Air Pollution

DIVISION S-7—FOREST & RANGE SOILS

Rainfall Timing and Ammonia Loss from Urea in a Loblolly Pine Plantation

Dep. of Crop and Soil Sci. and Agricultural and Environmental Services Lab. and School of Forest Resources, Univ. of Georgia, 2400 College Station Rd., Athens, GA 30602

^* Corresponding author (dkissel{at}uga.edu)

Surface application of urea to pine forests may lead to ammonia (NH₃) loss. It is generally believed that rainfall received soon after urea application will wash the urea and its hydrolysis products into the soil and stop NH₃ loss, but quantitative data are lacking, especially for the forest environment. The objective of this study was to quantify the effect of rainfall on loss of NH₃ when received at different times following urea application. Four field studies were performed in a midrotation loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) plantation, where NH₃ volatilization chambers were fertilized with 200 kg ha^–1 N and NH₃ losses were measured for either 29 or 58 d. In a complementary lab study, both NH₃ loss and movement of fertilizer N into the soil were measured following simulated rain. Loss of NH₃ from urea was either increased or not affected by simulated rainfall applied after the urea granules were dissolved by dew. Increased NH₃ loss due to simulated rainfall was attributed to inefficient downward leaching of urea and increased water content, which is known to increase the rate of urea hydrolysis. In contrast, simulated rainfall applied immediately after urea application reduced NH₃ losses to <1% of the applied urea. Our results show that unless rain occurs before urea is dissolved by morning dew, it may not be effective at leaching urea into the soil and reducing NH₃ losses. Further research should be conducted to elucidate the mechanism of urea retention by the O horizon in pine forests.

Abbreviations: RH, relative humidity

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D.E. Kissel, M.L. Cabrera, N. Vaio, J.R. Craig, J.A. Rema, and L.A. Morris Forest Floor Composition and Ammonia Loss from Urea in a Loblolly Pine Plantation Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., March 1, 2009; 73(2): 630 - 637. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Vaio, M. L. Cabrera, D.E. Kissel, J. A. Rema, J. F. Newsome, and V. H. Calvert II Ammonia Volatilization from Urea-Based Fertilizers Applied to Tall Fescue Pastures in Georgia, USA Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., September 30, 2008; 72(6): 1665 - 1671. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. L. Cabrera, D. E. Kissel, N. Vaio, J. R. Craig, J. A. Rema, and L. A. Morris Loblolly Pine Needles Retain Urea Fertilizer that Can Be Lost as Ammonia Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., August 4, 2005; 69(5): 1525 - 1531. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]