HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Qualls, R. G. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Qualls, R. G. Agricola Articles by Qualls, R. G. Related Collections Humic Substances Biogeochemical Processes Carbon Sequestration Soil Biochemistry Forest Soils

DIVISION S-7—FOREST & RANGE SOILS

Biodegradability of Humic Substances and Other Fractions of Decomposing Leaf Litter

Dep. of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Univ. of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557

^* Corresponding author (qualls{at}unr.edu)

Formation of chemically resistant humic substances might be an important process controlling recycling of soil C to the atmosphere. Humic substances are believed to be resistant to microbial decomposition because they accumulate in soil, but there is little direct experimental evidence for their inherent recalcitrance. My objective was to compare the microbial mineralization rates of the humic and fulvic acid fraction to other fractions of decayed plant matter in soil. Uniformly ¹⁴C labeled Populus fremontii leaf litter that had decomposed for 180 d was fractionated into the NaOH-insoluble residue, phenolic, humic acid, fulvic acid, hydrophilic acid, and hydrophilic neutral fractions. Humic acid comprised 22.7% of the C in the decomposed litter. These fractions were added to intact cores of soil or sand. Respired ¹⁴CO₂ was collected in NaOH and the radioactivity counted. The substrate C mineralized in soil at the end of 1 yr was, in order from least to greatest percentage of added radioactivity mineralized: humic acid (12.7%), fulvic acid (29.2%), phenolic (35.4%), ground litter (38.8%), hydrophilic acid (44.6%), hydrophilic neutral (51.3%), and the NaOH-insoluble residue (57.6%). In acid-washed, nutrient-amended sand, inoculated with soil microbes, the relative order of mineralization rates of the fractions was the same as in soil, but approximately 10% less C was mineralized. Results supported the hypothesis that humic substances are inherently difficult for microbes to mineralize, and this property can contribute to the sequestration of C in soil. Results also supported the hypothesis that the fulvic acid fraction is more rapidly mineralized than humic acid.

Abbreviations: t_1/2, half-decay time • DOC, dissolved organic carbon

This article has been cited by other articles:

				F. Adani and M. Spagnol Humic Acid Formation in Artificial Soils Amended with Compost at Different Stages of Organic Matter Evolution J. Environ. Qual., June 23, 2008; 37(4): 1608 - 1616. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]