HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Blanco-Canqui, H. Articles by Thompson, A. L. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Blanco-Canqui, H. Articles by Thompson, A. L. Agricola Articles by Blanco-Canqui, H. Articles by Thompson, A. L. Related Collections Runoff Soil Erosion

DIVISION S-6—SOIL & WATER MANAGEMENT & CONSERVATION

Soil Berms as an Alternative to Steel Plate Borders for Runoff Plots

^a School of Natural Resources, The Ohio State Univ., 2021 Coffey Rd., Columbus, OH 43210-1085
^b Environmental Soil Sci., 302 Anheuser-Busch Natural Resources Building, Univ. of Missouri–Columbia, Columbia, MO 65211
^c 251 Agricultural Engineering Building, Univ. of Missouri–Columbia, Columbia, MO 65211

^* Corresponding author (blanco.16{at}osu.edu)

Steel plates are often used to border runoff-erosion plots, but they are difficult to install and are expensive. This study assessed the effectiveness of using polyacrylamide (PAM; 2-propenamide, homopolymer) treated soil with and without geotextile fabric (GF) for soil berm plot borders in laboratory and field conditions. Hemispherically shaped soil berms of 250 mm wide by 150 mm high were constructed in erosion boxes. Erosion and runoff from untreated berms, berms treated with 9 kg ha^–1 of PAM, and berms treated with 9 kg ha^–1 of PAM and covered with GF (PAM-GF) were measured under simulated rainfall. A dry simulation run was conducted for 1 h followed by a wet simulation run after 24 h under field conditions. The PAM-GF reduced soil erosion from berms by 99% when compared with the untreated soil berm (control). Use of PAM alone reduced erosion from berms by 84%; however, erosion with PAM increased rapidly with time. Effectiveness of PAM alone decreased for reducing soil loss from 94% in the first 10 min of the 1-h dry run to 27% by the end of the 1-h wet run in field conditions. Although some runoff occurred from berms into the plots, this was insignificant for plot-to-berm ratios 10:1(P < 0.01). Results show that soil berms treated with PAM and GF reduced erosion to nondetectable levels. The cost for soil berm construction is about 10% of that for steel plate plot borders. The PAM-GF treated soil berms can be an economical alternative to conventional steel plate plot borders especially for short-term runoff studies.

Abbreviations: GF, geotextile fabric • PAM, polyacrylamide • PAM+G, polyacrylamide and gypsum • PAM-GF, polyacrylamide and geotextile fabric

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. Blanco-Canqui, C. J. Gantzer, and S. H. Anderson Performance of Grass Barriers and Filter Strips under Interrill and Concentrated Flow J. Environ. Qual., October 27, 2006; 35(6): 1969 - 1974. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]