HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (22) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by McLauchlan, K. K. Articles by Hobbie, S. E. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by McLauchlan, K. K. Articles by Hobbie, S. E. GeoRef GeoRef Citation Agricola Articles by McLauchlan, K. K. Articles by Hobbie, S. E. Related Collections Ecosystem Restoration Soil Organic Matter Soil Analysis

DIVISION S-3—SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY

Comparison of Labile Soil Organic Matter Fractionation Techniques

^a Environmental Studies Program, Dartmouth College, 6182 Steele Hall, Hanover, NH 03755
^b Dep. of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior, Univ. of Minnesota, 1987 Upper Buford Circle, St. Paul, MN 55108

^* Corresponding author (kendra.k.mclauchlan{at}dartmouth.edu)

Labile soil organic carbon (SOC_L), soil organic carbon with a relatively short turnover time, is an important source of energy for the belowground portion of ecosystems and is sensitive to land management changes. Many techniques exist to differentiate and quantify labile SOC, but rarely have these been directly compared. Here we compare the results of four common chemical, physical, and biological methods of empirically measuring labile SOC with soils taken from 33 restored grasslands that differ in length of time since cessation of agriculture. Among sites, microbial biomass C, acid-hydrolyzable C, the amount of C respired after 12 d of a laboratory incubation, and light fraction carbon (LFC) were all positively correlated with one another, although there were large differences in the sizes of the pools estimated with each method. Acid-hydrolyzable C consistently provided the largest estimate and 12-d incubations the smallest estimate of labile SOC. The quantity of labile SOC obtained by fitting respiration data from a laboratory incubation with a two-pool model with separate decay constants for each pool was also positively correlated with the three measures of labile soil C not derived from respiration data, although this technique was sensitive to whether the decay constant of the recalcitrant pool was constrained or not. All methods showed increases in labile SOC pools with increases in total soil organic carbon (SOC_T) pools, although the rate of change varied between techniques. The size of stable aggregates correlated positively with hydrolyzable C and SOC_T, supporting the idea that aggregates may physically protect soil C from decomposition, although the degree to which this C is labile is unclear.

Abbreviations: GMD, geometric mean diameter • LFC, light fraction carbon • POM, particulate organic matter • SOC, soil organic carbon • SOC_L, labile soil organic carbon • SOC_T, total soil organic carbon • SOM, soil organic matter

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. Majumder, B. Mandal, P. K. Bandyopadhyay, A. Gangopadhyay, P. K. Mani, A. L. Kundu, and D. Mazumdar Organic Amendments Influence Soil Organic Carbon Pools and Rice-Wheat Productivity Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., May 1, 2008; 72(3): 775 - 785. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. E. Kellogg, S. D. Bridgham, and D. Lopez-Hernandez A Comparison of Four Methods of Measuring Gross Phosphorus Mineralization Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., June 21, 2006; 70(4): 1349 - 1358. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. A. Paul, S. J. Morris, R. T. Conant, and A. F. Plante Does the Acid Hydrolysis-Incubation Method Measure Meaningful Soil Organic Carbon Pools? Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., April 19, 2006; 70(3): 1023 - 1035. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]