SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Siemens, J.
Right arrow Articles by Kaupenjohann, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Siemens, J.
Right arrow Articles by Kaupenjohann, M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Siemens, J.
Right arrow Articles by Kaupenjohann, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Field-Scale Studies
Right arrow Lysimeter/Rhizosphere Studies
Right arrow Soil Methods/Instrumentation
Published in Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 68:1191-1196 (2004).
© 2004 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA

DIVISION S-1—NOTES

Comparison of Three Methods for Field Measurement of Solute Leaching in a Sandy Soil

Jan Siemens* and Martin Kaupenjohann

Institute of Ecology, Dep. of Soil Science, Berlin Univ. of Technology, Salzufer 11-12, D-10587 Berlin, Germany

* Corresponding author (jan.siemens{at}tu-berlin.de).

To identify the most suitable technique for measuring solute leaching in a sandy soil, we compared three methods in an irrigation experiment (irrigation rates: 5 and 2.4 mm h–1) using Cl as a tracer. We tested tensiometer-controlled suction plates, wick samplers, and ion-exchange resin boxes installed between fiberglass pads. Ten samplers of each type were installed at a 52-cm depth (suction plates) or a 60-cm depth (wick and resin box samplers) into soil monoliths. The recovery of water and Cl by the suction plates varied little with irrigation rate (107–118%). The wick samplers performed well during 5 mm h–1 irrigation (Cl recovery: 111%; water recovery: 103%). However, at the irrigation rate of 2.4 mm h–1, the water recovery was significantly lower (70%), probably because the soil suction exceeded the maximum capillary force of the wicks. The wicks did not induce a retardation or additional dispersion of Cl compared with suction plates. The recovery of Cl by the resin boxes was only 6%. Tensiometer-controlled suction plates allowed an overall satisfactory estimation of water and solute fluxes in the sandy soil.

Abbreviations: BTC, breakthrough curve • CDE, convection-dispersion equation • CLT, convective lognormal transfer function




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
L. Weihermuller, J. Siemens, M. Deurer, S. Knoblauch, H. Rupp, A. Gottlein, and T. Putz
In Situ Soil Water Extraction: A Review
J. Environ. Qual., October 24, 2007; 36(6): 1735 - 1748.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
F. Morari
Drainage Flux Measurement and Errors Associated with Automatic Tension-controlled Suction Plates
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., September 20, 2006; 70(6): 1860 - 1871.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 2004 by the Soil Science Society of America.