SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Needelman, B. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kleinman, P. J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Needelman, B. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kleinman, P. J. A.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Needelman, B. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kleinman, P. J. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Watershed and Landscape Processes
Right arrow Runoff
Right arrow Surface Hydrology
Right arrow Nutrient Management
Published in Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 68:914-923 (2004).
© 2004 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA

DIVISION S-6—SOIL & WATER MANAGEMENT & CONSERVATION

Surface Runoff along Two Agricultural Hillslopes with Contrasting Soils

Brian A. Needelman*,a, William J. Gburekb, Gary W. Petersenc, Andrew N. Sharpleyb and Peter J. A. Kleinmanb

a Dep. of Natural Resource Sci. and Landscape Architecture, Univ. of Maryland, 1112 H.J. Patterson Hall, College Park, MD 20742
b Pasture Systems and Watershed Management Research Unit, USDA-ARS, Curtin Rd., University Park, PA 16802
c Dep. of Crop and Soil Sci., The Pennsylvania State Univ., 116 A.S.I. Building, University Park, PA 16802

* Corresponding author (bneed{at}umd.edu).

The targeting of critical surface runoff-producing zones should account for the influence of subsurface soil characteristics. In this study we assessed the runoff response of contrasting colluvial and residual soils. The study was conducted along two hillslopes within a 39.5-ha mixed land use watershed in Pennsylvania. Six sites (four colluvial, two residual) were monitored for runoff, hydraulic head, water table depth, and soil water content. A total of 111 rainfall events were monitored during the periods of July to December 2000, April to December 2001, and April to December 2002. Two high-intensity (5-min peak > 8 cm h–1) events had return periods of 2.5 and 4 yr. The colluvial soils are somewhat poorly and moderately well drained with fragipans and high clay content (37–44%) argillic horizons (fine, mixed, semiactive, mesic Aquic Fragiudalfs); the residual soils are well drained with moderate clay content (24%) argillic horizons (fine-loamy, mixed, semiactive, mesic Typic Hapludults). Across all events, overall runoff yields averaged 2.4% from the four colluvial sites and 0.01% from the two residual sites. The two colluvial sites with the greatest runoff production were located at the base of a primarily colluvial hillslope. The largest events at these sites occurred during periods of surface saturation (soil surface to a depth of at least 30 cm). These results suggest that nonwinter P management for these residual soils should focus on rare, large events. Nutrient management planning could be improved if runoff estimation methods were to better integrate information on subsurface and upslope soil hydrologic properties.

Abbreviations: VSA, variable source area




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
H. E. Winzeler, P. R. Owens, B. C. Joern, J. J. Camberato, B. D. Lee, D. E. Anderson, and D. R. Smith
Potassium Fertility and Terrain Attributes in a Fragiudalf Drainage Catena
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., September 1, 2008; 72(5): 1311 - 1320.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
Z. M. Easton, M. T. Walter, and T. S. Steenhuis
Combined Monitoring and Modeling Indicate the Most Effective Agricultural Best Management Practices
J. Environ. Qual., August 8, 2008; 37(5): 1798 - 1809.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
A. N. Sharpley, P. J. A. Kleinman, A. L. Heathwaite, W. J. Gburek, J. L. Weld, and G. J. Folmar
Integrating Contributing Areas and Indexing Phosphorus Loss from Agricultural Watersheds
J. Environ. Qual., June 23, 2008; 37(4): 1488 - 1496.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
A. N. Sharpley, P. J. A. Kleinman, A. L. Heathwaite, W. J. Gburek, G. J. Folmar, and J. P. Schmidt
Phosphorus Loss from an Agricultural Watershed as a Function of Storm Size
J. Environ. Qual., March 1, 2008; 37(2): 362 - 368.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
R. W. McDowell
Phosphorus and sediment loss in a catchment with winter forage grazing of cropland by dairy cattle.
J. Environ. Qual., March 1, 2006; 35(2): 575 - 583.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2004 by the Soil Science Society of America.