HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (44) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Goebel, M.-O. Articles by Horton, R. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Goebel, M.-O. Articles by Horton, R. Agricola Articles by Goebel, M.-O. Articles by Horton, R. Related Collections Soil Hydrology Soil Chemistry Soil Physics

DIVISION S-1—SOIL PHYSICS

Water Potential and Aggregate Size Effects on Contact Angle and Surface Energy

^a Institute of Soil Science, Univ. of Hannover, Herrenhaeuser Str. 2, 30419 Hannover, Germany
^b Dep. of Agronomy, Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA 50011

^* Corresponding author (goebel{at}ifbk.uni-hannover.de).

Soil wettability affects hydrological processes like infiltration, percolation, preferential flow, and surface runoff. Wettability is related to the soil-water contact angle, which in turn depends on the solid surface free energy. Little is known, however, about contact angles and their dependence on soil water potential. The main objective of this study was therefore to investigate the dynamics of contact angle due to variation of the water potential. Aggregate fractions of 2- to 4-, 1- to 2-, and <1-mm diameter and corresponding homogenized material of a subcritical water repellent Orthic Luvisol were studied at water potentials of –1000, –154, –30, and –0.14 MPa. Wettability was assessed in terms of the advancing contact angle by the capillary rise method (CRM). Additionally, we calculated the surface free energy. Results showed, that the contact angle increased as water potential increased to a specific level. It was found for several soil samples, that above this water potential level, the contact angle decreased again. The change of contact angle due to variation of water potential reached nearly 90° for one sample. Contact angles of homogenized fractions were slightly larger than those measured for the aggregate surfaces. Surface free energy was consistently between 55 and 65 mJ m^–2 with relative contributions of the dispersion and polar components to surface free energy of approximately 1/3 and 2/3, respectively. We conclude, that the assessment and physical description of the specific water potential for which a surface becomes wettable is a key factor for a better understanding of soil wetting.

Abbreviations: CRM, capillary rise method • RH, relative humidity • SOM, soil organic matter • WC, gravimetric water content • WDPT, water drop penetration time

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Carminati and H. Fluhler Water Infiltration and Redistribution in Soil Aggregate Packings Vadose Zone J., March 5, 2009; 8(1): 150 - 157. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. M. Regalado and A. Ritter A Soil Water Repellency Empirical Model Vadose Zone J., February 10, 2009; 8(1): 136 - 141. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. M. Regalado and A. Ritter Cokriging Spatial Interpolation of Soil Water Dependent Repellency Parameters Determined with Two Different Tests Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., October 30, 2008; 72(6): 1683 - 1693. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Ishiguro and T. Fujii Upward Infiltration into Porous Media as Affected by Wettability and Anionic Surfactants Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., May 1, 2008; 72(3): 741 - 749. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Kawamoto, P. Moldrup, T. Komatsu, L. W. de Jonge, and M. Oda Water Repellency of Aggregate Size Fractions of a Volcanic Ash Soil Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., September 28, 2007; 71(6): 1658 - 1666. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Bachmann, M. Deurer, and G. Arye Modeling Water Movement in Heterogeneous Water-Repellent Soil: 1. Development of a Contact Angle Dependent Water-Retention Model Vadose Zone J., August 1, 2007; 6(3): 436 - 445. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Klitzke and F. Lang Hydrophobicity of Soil Colloids and Heavy Metal Mobilization: Effects of Drying J. Environ. Qual., June 27, 2007; 36(4): 1187 - 1193. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Arye, I. Nadav, and Y. Chen Short-term Reestablishment of Soil Water Repellency after Wetting: Effect on Capillary Pressure-Saturation Relationship Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., April 5, 2007; 71(3): 692 - 702. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. M. Regalado and A. Ritter Geostatistical Tools for Characterizing the Spatial Variability of Soil Water Repellency Parameters in a Laurel Forest Watershed Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., May 23, 2006; 70(4): 1071 - 1081. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				U. Buczko and O. Bens Assessing Soil Hydrophobicity and Its Variability through the Soil Profile Using Two Different Methods Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., March 29, 2006; 70(3): 718 - 727. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. M. Regalado and A. Ritter Characterizing Water Dependent Soil Repellency with Minimal Parameter Requirement Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., October 27, 2005; 69(6): 1955 - 1966. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. H. Ellerbrock, H. H. Gerke, J. Bachmann, and M.-O. Goebel Composition of Organic Matter Fractions for Explaining Wettability of Three Forest Soils Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 1, 2005; 69(1): 57 - 66. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]