| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
a Plant Soil Interface Programme, Scottish Crop Research Institute, Dundee, DD2 5DA, Scotland
b Environment Division, Scottish Agricultural College, Bush Estate, Penicuik, EH26 0PH, Scotland
c Scottish Informatics Mathematics Biology & Statistics SIMBIOS (Centre), University of Abertay Dundee, Bell Street, DD1 1HG, Scotland
* Corresponding author (p.hallett{at}scri.sari.ac.uk).
Recent evidence suggests that reduced water infiltration may be linked to small scale microbial and/or chemical processes that cause subcritical water repellency. We measured water sorptivity on the surface of a large intact block of soil (0.9 m wide, 1.3 m long, 0.25 m deep) taken from a grassland site and examined the effects of surface elevation and water repellency on water sorptivity at the millimeter scale. The soil block was partially dried to 0.22 mm3 mm–3, appeared to wet readily, and is not severely water repellent at any water content. Water sorptivity varied from 0.1 to 0.8 mm s–1/2 across the sampling grid with a coefficient of variation (CV) of 0.57. Water repellency, determined by comparing water and ethanol sorptivities, also varied considerably (CV = 0.47). Geostatistical analyses of water sorptivity and repellency measurements found little evidence of spatial autocorrelation, suggesting a high degree of local variability. These data were compared to larger scale measurements obtained with conventional infiltrometers under tension conditions (40 mm contact radius), and ponded conditions (37 and 55 mm radius rings) where macropores influence infiltration heterogeneity. Larger scale tension infiltrometer measurements were less variable with a CV of 0.22, whereas ponded infiltrometer measurements were more variable, CV > 0.50, presumably because of the influence of macropore flow. Data collected on surface elevation showed that ponded infiltration but not tension infiltration was influenced by surface topography. The results suggested that repellency can induce levels of spatial variability in water transport at small scales comparable to what macropores induce at larger scales.
Abbreviations: CV, coefficient of variation
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  C. M. Regalado and A. Ritter Cokriging Spatial Interpolation of Soil Water Dependent Repellency Parameters Determined with Two Different Tests Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., October 30, 2008; 72(6): 1683 - 1693. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Bachmann, M. Deurer, and G. Arye Modeling Water Movement in Heterogeneous Water-Repellent Soil: 1. Development of a Contact Angle Dependent Water-Retention Model Vadose Zone J., August 1, 2007; 6(3): 436 - 445. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Deurer and J. Bachmann Modeling Water Movement in Heterogeneous Water-Repellent Soil: 2. A Conceptual Numerical Simulation Vadose Zone J., August 1, 2007; 6(3): 446 - 457. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. M. Regalado and A. Ritter Geostatistical Tools for Characterizing the Spatial Variability of Soil Water Repellency Parameters in a Laurel Forest Watershed Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., May 23, 2006; 70(4): 1071 - 1081. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
U. Buczko and O. Bens Assessing Soil Hydrophobicity and Its Variability through the Soil Profile Using Two Different Methods Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., March 29, 2006; 70(3): 718 - 727. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. M. Regalado and A. Ritter Characterizing Water Dependent Soil Repellency with Minimal Parameter Requirement Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., October 27, 2005; 69(6): 1955 - 1966. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| The SCI Journals | Agronomy Journal | Crop Science | |||
| Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education |
Vadose Zone Journal | ||||
| Journal of Plant Registrations | Journal of Environmental Quality |
The Plant Genome | |||
