HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Robinson, D. A. Articles by Shouse, P. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Robinson, D. A. Articles by Shouse, P. Agricola Articles by Robinson, D. A. Articles by Shouse, P. Related Collections Soil Methods/Instrumentation Soil Salinity Electromagnetic Induction, EMI

DIVISION S-1—SOIL PHYSICS

Minimizing Drift in Electrical Conductivity Measurements in High Temperature Environments using the EM-38

USDA-ARS, George E. Brown, Jr. Salinity Lab., 450 W. Big Springs Road, Riverside, CA 92507

^* Corresponding author (darearthscience{at}yahoo.com).

The EM-38 is a noninvasive instrument, commonly used for monitoring salinity, mapping bulk soil properties, and evaluating soil nutrient status. Users in the Southwest USA have observed as much as 20% "drift" in the measurement of bulk soil electrical conductivity (EC_a) with this instrument. This drift has usually been ignored or compensated for by statistical procedures. We performed laboratory and field experiments to determine if the drift is due to calibration instability of the instrument or to heating of the instrument by the sun. In laboratory experiments, after a warm-up period, the instrument provided constant readings in the range 25 to 40°C; above 40°C the response of the instrument was unpredictable. In field experiments, where we placed the EM-38 in a fixed location we observed an unexpected response at air temperatures below 40°C. Temperature sensors in different locations on the instrument demonstrated that temperature differences between the instrument's transmitting and receiving coils and the control panel (CP) were as great as 20°C. As the instrument is temperature compensated from this CP, erroneous compensation occurred when the instrument was placed in direct sunlight. In this study, we demonstrate that differential heating of the EM-38 is one cause of drift and erroneous bulk electrical conductivity measurement; shading the instrument substantially reduced this problem, effectively extending the reliable working temperature range by minimizing drift.

Abbreviations: CP, control panel • EC_a, bulk soil electrical conductivity • H_i, induced magnetic field • H_p, primary magnetic field • Rx, receiving coil • Tx, transmitting coil

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. Abdu, D.A. Robinson, and S.B. Jones Comparing Bulk Soil Electrical Conductivity Determination Using the DUALEM-1S and EM38-DD Electromagnetic Induction Instruments Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 1, 2007; 71(1): 189 - 196. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]