SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Abu-Hamdeh, N. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Abu-Hamdeh, N. H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Abu-Hamdeh, N. H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Soil Physics
Right arrow Tillage
Right arrow Soil Compaction
Soil Science Society of America Journal 67:1213-1219 (2003)
© 2003 Soil Science Society of America

DIVISION S-6—SOIL & WATER MANAGEMENT & CONSERVATION

Compaction and Subsoiling Effects on Corn Growth and Soil Bulk Density

Nidal H. Abu-Hamdeh*

Postal Code 21110, P.O. Box 422, Irbid, Jordan

* Corresponding author (nidal{at}just.edu.jo)

Many soil physical properties and crop yield are affected by compaction. The effects of compaction of two axle loads resulting from wheel traffic on soil bulk density and crop growth were investigated. Subsoiling as a method to alleviate or reduce effects of soil compaction was evaluated. As a result of compacting loads in 2000, corn (Zea mays L.) yield was reduced by 26.8 and 14.5% in 2000 and 2001. Even two years after compaction, soil bulk density was 1.6 to 6.1% greater than the zero-load from 10- to 50-cm depths by 8- and 19-Mg axle loads. Plants in compacted plots had a greater concentration of roots near the base of the plant compared with the plants in the zero-load plots. Plants in the subsoiled plots had fewer roots concentrated near the base of the plant compared with the plants in the nonsubsoiled plots for each load. Plant height was also significantly reduced by compaction. Compaction affected plant and soil properties, but subsoiling removed the compaction effect and improved soil properties, growth, and yield.

Abbreviations: LCML, lower critical mechanical limit • UCML, upper critical mechanical limit




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
D. Sidhu and S. W. Duiker
Soil Compaction in Conservation Tillage: Crop Impacts
Agron. J., August 3, 2006; 98(5): 1257 - 1264.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
D. W. Sweeney, M. B. Kirkham, and J. B. Sisson
Crop and Soil Response to Wheel-Track Compaction of a Claypan Soil
Agron. J., May 3, 2006; 98(3): 637 - 643.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2003 by the Soil Science Society of America.