HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Chaplot, V. A. M. Articles by Le Bissonnais, Y. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Chaplot, V. A. M. Articles by Le Bissonnais, Y. GeoRef GeoRef Citation Agricola Articles by Chaplot, V. A. M. Articles by Le Bissonnais, Y. Related Collections Soil Erosion

DIVISION S-6—SOIL & WATER MANAGEMENT & CONSERVATION

Runoff Features for Interrill Erosion at Different Rainfall Intensities, Slope Lengths, and Gradients in an Agricultural Loessial Hillslope

INRA, Science du Sol, Avenue De lab Pomme de Pin, B.P. 20619, Ardon, 45166 Olivet cedex, France

^* Corresponding author (chaplotird{at}laopdr.com)

Various interactions, particularly those existing between the rainfall intensity, the slope gradient, the slope length, and the tillage supposedly can affect the runoff features for interrill erosion. Despite numerous studies, their effect on runoff production and pathways and the resulting soil losses have seldom been analyzed. This is especially true under field and tillage conditions. This study investigated the effect of rainfall intensity, slope length, and gradient on runoff amount and pathways for interrill erosion in tilled fields. Runoff features and soil losses were evaluated on bounded plots of 1- and 5-m length located on 4 to 8% slope gradients, and under natural and simulated rainfalls with intensities ranging from 1.5 to 30 mm h^-1. Runoff coefficients (R) ranged from 34 to 98% whereas sediment concentrations (SC) varied from 2.9 to 49 g l^-1. The runoff coefficient was affected by all three factors: rainfall intensity (r = 0.48; P < 0.0001), slope gradient (r = 0.51; P < 0.0001) and slope length (r = 0.29; P = 0.02); whereas SC was correlated with only rainfall intensity (r = 0.48; P < 0.0001) and slope length (r = 0.44; P = 0.0004). The runoff coefficient and SC ratios between 1- and 5-m long plots were systematically greater for the intermediate rainfall intensity. Runoff features mainly affected by tillage implements may explain higher interrill erosion at longer and steeper slopes. Lower differences between 1- and 5-m plots at high rainfall intensity may reflect greater ponded runoff absorbing raindrop kinetic energy and lowering detachment and transport processes. Finally, the effects of rainfall intensity, slope length, and gradient and tillage are discussed in respect of possible erosion processes operating in the experiments.

Abbreviations: CEC, cation-exchange capacity • DEM, digital elevation model • SC, sediment concentration • SL, soil loss rate