HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Si, B. C. Articles by Kachanoski, R. G. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Si, B. C. Articles by Kachanoski, R. G. Agricola Articles by Si, B. C. Articles by Kachanoski, R. G. Related Collections Soil Physics Time Domain Reflectometry, TDR Spatial Variability

DIVISION S-1—SOIL PHYSICS

Measurement of Local Soil Water Flux during Field Solute Transport Experiments

^a Dep. of Soil Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
^b Dep. of Renewable Resources, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada

^* Corresponding author (bing.si{at}usask.ca)

Accurate measurement of local soil water flux, at the same location as solute concentration, remains a challenge, and the lack of these measurements limits our understanding of field solute transport. The objective of this paper is to develop and test methods for measuring local soil water flux under steady-state constant flux infiltration, typical of field solute transport experiments. The methods use vertically installed time domain reflectometry (TDR) probes to measure local solute mass flux from the change in TDR measured impedance after either a step increase or decrease (flushing) in electrolyte (tracer) concentration in the applied water. The local soil water flux was calculated directly from the local solute mass flux. The methods assume that water flow and solute transport are one-dimensional and that TDR estimates of bulk electrical conductivity are not sensitive to the vertical distribution of the applied tracer in the pore water. Field experiments indicate estimates of local soil water flux from step increase and step decrease of tracer concentration were very similar (R² 0.63) and average water flux was similar to the application rate. There was moderate correlation between local water fluxes measured using these steady-state methods, and a previously reported method based on early time measurements of water storage during the initial (transient) states of water infiltration. The methods can be used to estimate field average hydraulic conductivity as a function of soil water content.

Abbreviations: EC_a, electrical conductivity • TDR, time domain reflectometry