HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by He, Z. L. Articles by Li, Y. C. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by He, Z. L. Articles by Li, Y. C. Agricola Articles by He, Z. L. Articles by Li, Y. C. Related Collections Plant Nutrition Nitrogen

DIVISION S-4—SOIL FERTILITY & PLANT NUTRITION

Thresholds of Leaf Nitrogen for Optimum Fruit Production and Quality in Grapefruit

^a University of Florida, IFAS, Indian River Research and Education Center, Fort Pierce, FL34945
^b USDA-ARS-PWA Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center, 24106 N. Bunn Road, Prosser, WA 99350
^c University of Florida, IFAS, Tropical Research and Education Center, Homestead, FL 33031

^* Corresponding author (zhe{at}mail.ifas.ufl.edu)

Fertilization is critical for sustainable production of citrus on sandy soils. However, information on nutritional diagnosis standards for grapefruit (Citrus x paradisi Macfad. ) is lacking and this information is needed for implementation of best management practices (BMPs). A field experiment was conducted from 1997 to 2000 on a Riviera fine sand (loamy, siliceous, hyperthermic, Arenic Glossaqualf) with 30-yr-old+ white Marsh grapefruit trees on sour orange (Citrus aurantium L.) rootstock to evaluate irrigation and fertilization effects on fruit yield and quality and to validate leaf nutrient concentration standards for guiding fertilization of grapefruit. Fertilizers were applied as water soluble granular (WSG, 3 applications yr^-1), by fertigation (FRT, 15 applications yr^-1), or as controlled-release fertilizers (CRF, 1 application yr^-1) and at five rates (0, 56, 112, 168, or 224 kg N ha^-1 yr^-1) with an N:P:K blend (1.0:0.17:1.02). Fruit yield and quality were not affected by irrigation treatments or fertilizer sources. There was a significantly positive correlation between leaf N concentrations and N rates (r = 0.98**). Fruit yield was linearly related to N rates or leaf N concentrations. At 90% of maximum yield, leaf N concentrations (dry weight basis) were 22 to 23 g kg^-1. Fruit quality parameters such as soluble solid concentration (SSC), juice, and total soluble solids (TSS) were positively correlated with leaf N concentrations, whereas fruit titratable acidity (TA) was negatively related to leaf N concentrations or N rates. The effect of N rate on TA outweighed that on SSC and consequently, the SSC/TA ratio decreased with increasing N rates or leaf N concentration. Fruit size was quadratically related to N rate or leaf N concentration. Overall, fruit sizes and SSC/TA ratios were acceptable for fresh marketing or processing at leaf N concentrations of 22 to 23 g kg^-1. Therefore, this leaf N concentration of 22 to 23 g kg^-1 can be considered the optimal concentration guideline for fertilization of grapefruit provided that other nutrients are sufficient.

Abbreviations: BMPs, best management practices • CRF, controlled release fertilizer • DW, dry weight • FRT, fertigation • SSC, soluble solid concentration • TA, titratable acidity • TSS, total soluble solids • WSG, water soluble granular