|
|
||||||||
Dep. of Agriculture and Rural Development, Agricultural and Environmental Science Division, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX, UK
* Corresponding author (jim.stevens{at}dardni.gov.uk)
We tested the reliability of 12-mL Exetainers (Labco Ltd., High Wycombe, UK) fitted with bromobutyl rubber septa for the storage of a gas sample containing 15N-labeled N2O and N2. The gas mixture was analyzed monthly over a 1-yr storage period by continuous-flow isotope-ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS). After a year the N2O concentration had decreased by 30% but the change in 15N enrichment of N2O was not detectable. Accurate determination of the N2O concentration was possible up to 1 yr if a calibration gas was stored and analyzed along with the test mixture. This technique has wide applicability because diffusive loss of N2O as a fraction of starting concentration was predicted by Fick's Law to be almost independent of concentration above 3 µL L-1. The rate of decrease in the enrichment of N2 as measured by the ratio differences for 29/28 and 30/28 was slow. Decreases were not significantly different from time zero values after storage for 8 wk. After 1 yr of storage the losses of 29N2 and 30N2 significantly lowered the calculated value for the fraction of the N2 from the labeled pool (d) by about 2% of the initial value, but had no effect on the calculated value for the enrichment of the labeled pool (15XN). The diffusivity of N2O, calculated from loss rate and concentration gradient between Exetainer and atmosphere using Fick's Law, was 40 times higher than that of 29N2 or 30N2. Nitrous oxide may have been lost from the Exetainer because of adsorption by the septum as well as diffusion through the septum.
Abbreviations: aD, the enrichment of the pool from which the labeled N2O is derived d, the fraction of the N2 derived from the labeled source I, ion current IRMS, isotope-ratio mass spectrometry LSD, least significant difference R, molecular ratio 15XN, the enrichment of the pool from which the labeled N2 is derived
29R, difference between the molecular ratios for 29N2/28N2 in the enriched test sample and normal atmosphere
30R, difference between the molecular ratios for 30N2/28N2 in the enriched test sample and normal atmosphere
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Wagner-Riddle, Q. C. Hu, E. van Bochove, and S. Jayasundara Linking Nitrous Oxide Flux During Spring Thaw to Nitrate Denitrification in the Soil Profile Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., May 29, 2008; 72(4): 908 - 916. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Rochette and N. S. Eriksen-Hamel Chamber Measurements of Soil Nitrous Oxide Flux: Are Absolute Values Reliable? Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., March 1, 2008; 72(2): 331 - 342. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Jensen, B. Thamdrup, and T. Dalsgaard Effects of Specific Inhibitors on Anammox and Denitrification in Marine Sediments Appl. Envir. Microbiol., May 15, 2007; 73(10): 3151 - 3158. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| The SCI Journals | Agronomy Journal | Crop Science | |||
| Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education |
Vadose Zone Journal | ||||
| Journal of Plant Registrations | Journal of Environmental Quality |
The Plant Genome | |||