SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hume, N. P.
Right arrow Articles by Horne, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hume, N. P.
Right arrow Articles by Horne, A. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Hume, N. P.
Right arrow Articles by Horne, A. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Water Quality
Right arrow Wetlands and Aquatic Processes
Right arrow Surface Water Quality
Right arrow Nutrient Management
Right arrow Plant Analysis
Right arrow Water Pollution
Soil Science Society of America Journal 66:1706-1712 (2002)
© 2002 Soil Science Society of America

DIVISION S-10—WETLAND SOILS

Denitrification Potential and Carbon Quality of Four Aquatic Plants in Wetland Microcosms

Noah P. Hume*, Maia S. Fleming and Alexander J. Horne

Ecological Engineering Group, Civil & Environmental Engineering Dep., Univ. of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720-1710

* Corresponding author (noah{at}stillwatersci.com)

The C quality of four aquatic plants found in wetlands explains the differences in their relative capacity to fuel denitrification. In replicated (n = 4) flow-through microcosm experiments we compared nitrate removal using equal C additions of two emergent plants (Scirpus acutus, Typha latifolia) and two floating plants (Hydrocotyle umbellata, Lemna minor). As expected, plant litter with the highest initial C/N and lignin content (Scirpus acutus), required significantly (p < 0.05) higher dry matter addition to achieve the nitrate removals of the other plants studied. For all plants, losses in C content and significantly (p < 0.05) higher C/N ratios in leached litter is consistent with preferential hydrolysis of low molecular weight (MW) carbohydrates. Interestingly, plant-specific differences in this denitrification potential were removed when nitrate removal data was compared on an acid-soluble carbohydrate (ASC) basis. As an efficiency measure, high ratios of applied C to NO3–N decreased denitrification potentials, whereas increasing NO3–N loading at equal C additions increased denitrification potentials. Differences in denitrification potential resulting from carbohydrate and lignin content of the plants studied were generally smaller than relative differences in reported productivity. That much of the plant C left the microcosms before oxidation is consistent with overall electron acceptor limitation in wetlands and suggests observable differences in field-scale denitrification performance may still arise with the presence or absence of highly productive reed (e.g., Scirpus sp., Typha sp.) stands.

Abbreviations: AFDW, ash-free dry weight • ASC, acid soluble Carbohydrates • DW, dry weight • MW, molecular weight







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2002 by the Soil Science Society of America.