SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Li, H.
Right arrow Articles by Segarra, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Li, H.
Right arrow Articles by Segarra, E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Li, H.
Right arrow Articles by Segarra, E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Spatial Distribution
Right arrow Wetlands and Aquatic Processes
Right arrow Site-Specific Analysis
Soil Science Society of America Journal 66:585-595 (2002)
© 2002 Soil Science Society of America


DIVISION S-6—SOIL & WATER MANAGEMENT & CONSERVATION

State-Space Description of Field Heterogeneity

Water and Nitrogen Use in Cotton

Hong Lia,e, Robert J. Lascano*,b, Jill Bookerb, L. Ted Wilsonc, Kevin F. Bronsond and Eduardo Segarrae

a Texas A&M Univ., current address: Dept. of Soil Science, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695
b Texas A&M University–USDA-ARS, 3810 4th Street, Lubbock, TX 79415
c Texas A&M University, 1509 Aggie Drive, Beaumont, TX 77713
d Texas A&M Univ., Rt. 3, Box 219, Lubbock, TX 79403
e Economics, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409

* Corresponding author (r-lascano{at}tamu.edu)

Field heterogeneity in soil texture and site elevation (SE) may affect crop water and N use. A 2-yr (1998–1999) study was conducted on the Texas High Plains to determine the interdependence between management (irrigation and N fertilization), soil heterogeneity (texture, soil water, and NO3-N) and topography, and their impact on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) lint yield and N uptake. Treatments were irrigation at 50 and 75% estimated cotton evapotranspiration (ET) and N rates at 0, 90, and 135 kg ha-1. Soil water content (SWC), lint yield, N uptake, and N fertilizer recovery, measured as a function of management and space, were higher on low positions. Mixed model analysis showed that irrigation was significant on SWC, lint yield, and N uptake (P < 0.05) each year. The N treatment had no effect on lint yield or N uptake in 1998 because of high soil residual NO3-N, and the model residual was significant for all measured variables (P < 0.0001). Sand, SWC, lint yield, and N uptake were negatively correlated with SE (r >= -0.64). In 1998, lint yield, SWC, clay, sand, and SE were cross correlated within 60 to 80 m. Multivariate state-space analysis showed that lint yield at position i was weighted on lint yield, SWC, clay, sand, and SE at previous position i - 1. It is concluded that 75% ET and N rate at 90 kg ha-1 would be the basis to consider variable water and N rates related to field conditions, and the state-space model quantified spatial interdependence between irrigation, fertilization, and field heterogeneity.

Abbreviations: ET, evapotranspiration • ICB, incomplete block design • LEPA, Low Energy Precision Application • RE, relative elevation • SD, standard deviation • SE, site elevation • SWC, soil water content




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
P. Lu, Y. Su, Z. Niu, and J. Wu
Geostatistical Analysis and Risk Assessment on Soil Total Nitrogen and Total Soil Phosphorus in the Dongting Lake Plain Area, China
J. Environ. Qual., May 25, 2007; 36(4): 935 - 942.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
K. F. Bronson, J. D. Booker, J. P. Bordovsky, J. W. Keeling, T. A. Wheeler, R. K. Boman, M. N. Parajulee, E. Segarra, and R. L. Nichols
Site-Specific Irrigation and Nitrogen Management for Cotton Production in the Southern High Plains
Agron. J., January 5, 2006; 98(1): 212 - 219.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
J. Iqbal, J. J. Read, A. J. Thomasson, and J. N. Jenkins
Relationships between Soil-Landscape and Dryland Cotton Lint Yield
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., May 6, 2005; 69(3): 872 - 882.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
T. B. Zeleke and B. C. Si
Scaling Properties of Topographic Indices and Crop Yield: Multifractal and Joint Multifractal Approaches
Agron. J., July 1, 2004; 96(4): 1082 - 1090.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
A. N. Kravchenko, K. D. Thelen, D. G. Bullock, and N. R. Miller
Relationship among Crop Grain Yield, Topography, and Soil Electrical Conductivity Studied with Cross-Correlograms
Agron. J., September 1, 2003; 95(5): 1132 - 1139.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
K. F. Bronson, J. W. Keeling, J. D. Booker, T. T. Chua, T. A. Wheeler, R. K. Boman, and R. J. Lascano
Influence of Landscape Position, Soil Series, and Phosphorus Fertilizer on Cotton Lint Yield
Agron. J., July 1, 2003; 95(4): 949 - 957.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2002 by the Soil Science Society of America.