| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
a USDA-ARS Soil Dynamics Research Unit, 411 S. Donahue Dr., Auburn, AL 36832
b Dep. of Agronomy and Soils, 202 Funchess Hall, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849
* Corresponding author (wreeves{at}acesag.auburn.edu)
Yield reductions from no-tillage cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) jeopardized adoption of conservation systems in the Tennessee Valley region of north Alabama in the early 1990s. We conducted a study from 1995 to 1999 on a Decatur silt loam (fine, kaolinitic, thermic Rhodic Paleudults) to develop a practical conservation tillage system with competitive yields for the region. Treatments included a factorial combination of fall ridging (ridged and nonridged) and fall non-inversion deep tillage (none, in-row subsoiling, paratilling), along with spring strip tillage and conventional tillage (fall chisel-spring disk). All treatments, except conventional tillage, were established with a rye (Secale cereale L.) cover crop. Tillage systems were evaluated for soil temperature, penetration resistance, a soil compaction index, soil water, plant population, and seed cotton yield. Paratilling reduced soil compaction index 29 and 31% compared with conventional tillage and no-tillage, respectively. Subsoiling reduced the compaction index 12 and 15% compared with conventional tillage and no-tillage, respectively. Soil water content was decreased with the fall paratilled and subsoiled conservation tillage systems, compared with conventional tillage and no-tillage, suggesting increased rooting. Fall non-inversion deep tillage, either paratilling or in-row subsoiling with a narrow-shanked subsoiler, resulted in the highest seed cotton yields; 16% greater than conventional tillage (2660 kg ha-1), and 10% greater than strict no-tillage (2810 kg ha-1) across a 4-yr duration. In this region, non-inversion deep tillage under the row in fall, coupled with a rye cover crop to produce adequate residue for moisture conservation and erosion control, is a highly competitive and practical conservation tillage system.
Abbreviations: DAP, days after planting • RCB, randomized complete block design
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. S. Reiter, D. W. Reeves, C. H. Burmester, and H. A. Torbert Cotton Nitrogen Management in a High-Residue Conservation System: Cover Crop Fertilization Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., September 1, 2008; 72(5): 1321 - 1329. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. S. Reiter, D. W. Reeves, and C. H. Burmester Cotton Nitrogen Management in a High-Residue Conservation System: Source, Rate, Method, and Timing Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., September 1, 2008; 72(5): 1330 - 1336. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D.G. Sullivan, J.N. Shaw, A. Price, and E. van Santen Spectral Reflectance Properties of Winter Cover Crops in the Southeastern Coastal Plain Agron. J., November 6, 2007; 99(6): 1587 - 1596. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C.C. Truman, T.C. Strickland, T.L. Potter, D.H. Franklin, D.D. Bosch, and C.W. Bednarz Variable Rainfall Intensity and Tillage Effects on Runoff, Sediment, and Carbon Losses from a Loamy Sand under Simulated Rainfall J. Environ. Qual., August 31, 2007; 36(5): 1495 - 1502. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Siri-Prieto, D. W. Reeves, and R. L. Raper Tillage Requirements for Integrating Winter-Annual Grazing in Cotton Production: Plant Water Status and Productivity Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 1, 2007; 71(1): 197 - 205. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. L. Cerdeira and S. O. Duke The Current Status and Environmental Impacts of Glyphosate-Resistant Crops: A Review J. Environ. Qual., August 9, 2006; 35(5): 1633 - 1658. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. W. Katsvairo, D. L. Wright, J. J. Marois, D. L. Hartzog, J. R. Rich, and P. J. Wiatrak Sod-Livestock Integration into the Peanut-Cotton Rotation: A Systems Farming Approach Agron. J., June 27, 2006; 98(4): 1156 - 1171. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. S. Balkcom, D. W. Reeves, J. N. Shaw, C. H. Burmester, and L. M. Curtis Cotton Yield and Fiber Quality from Irrigated Tillage Systems in the Tennessee Valley Agron. J., April 11, 2006; 98(3): 596 - 602. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. K. Reddy, E. Z. Nyakatawa, and D. W. Reeves Tillage and Poultry Litter Application Effects on Cotton Growth and Yield Agron. J., November 1, 2004; 96(6): 1641 - 1650. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. J. Boquet, R. L. Hutchinson, and G. A. Breitenbeck Long-Term Tillage, Cover Crop, and Nitrogen Rate Effects on Cotton: Yield and Fiber Properties Agron. J., September 1, 2004; 96(5): 1436 - 1442. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| The SCI Journals | Agronomy Journal | Crop Science | |||
| Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education |
Vadose Zone Journal | ||||
| Journal of Plant Registrations | Journal of Environmental Quality |
The Plant Genome | |||
